期刊文献+

基于Kriging代理模型的倒角建筑流场优化

Optimization of Chamfer Angel Architecture Flow Distribution Based on Kriging Surrogate Model
下载PDF
导出
摘要 结构高层建筑受风荷载的影响较大,而建筑形态是影响建筑风荷载的一个重要因素。故建立了倒角建筑流场优化的4种代理模型,通过误差分析发现Kriging代理模型是较好的代理模型,而后采用MIGA,NLPQL,AMGA,MMFD的4种算法对代理模型进行了优化分析,使模型中的最小负压最少提高了48.09%,达到了优化目标。 Structural high- rise buildings have been affected by the wind load, which has been influenced by architectural form. This passage built four surrogate models optimized by chamfering architecture flow field. By the error analysis, we found that Kriging surrogate mode is better than others, and later adopted four algorithms, MIGA, NLPQL, AMGA and MMFD, for surrogate optimized analysis, which has increased by 48.09% at least of the model minimum negative pressure to optimize objective.
作者 赵紫岩 胡卫兵 王俊波 Zhao Zi-yan;Hu Wei-bing;Wang Jun-bo
出处 《建筑技术开发》 2017年第12X期91-93,共3页 Building Technology Development
关键词 代理模型 倒角建筑 优化分析 surrogate model comer undercutting architecture optimized analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献42

  • 1李文沅,卢继平.暂态稳定概率评估的蒙特卡罗方法[J].中国电机工程学报,2005,25(10):18-23. 被引量:66
  • 2汪大绥,周建龙,袁兴方.上海环球金融中心结构设计[J].建筑结构,2007,37(5):8-12. 被引量:31
  • 3丛娜,吴成东,丁君德.建筑节能综合评价指标体系[J].智能建筑,2007(9):47-50. 被引量:12
  • 4GOLOVIDOV, OLEG B, MASON, et al. Response Surface Approximations for Aerodynamic Parameters in High Speed Civil Transport Optimization[A]. Technical Report,Computer Science[DB/OL], Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. http://historical.ncstrl.org/tr/ps/vatechcs/TR-97-15.ps.
  • 5KNILL D L, GIUNTA A A, BAKER C A, et al. Response surface models combining linear and euler aerodynamics for supersonic transport design[J]. J Aircraft, 1999,36(1):75-86.
  • 6UNAL R, LEPSCH R A, MCMILLIN M. Response Surface Model Building and Multidisciplinary Optimization Using D-Optimal Designs[A]. Colle-ction of Technical Papers for 7th Annual AIAA/NASA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization[C].1998,405-411.
  • 7JIN R, CHEN W, SIMPSON T W. Comparative studies of metamodeling techniques under multiple modeling criteria[J]. Journal of Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2001,23(1):1-13.
  • 8GIUNTA A A, DUDLEY J M, NARDUCCI R, et al. Noisy Aerodynamic Response and Smooth Approximations in HSCT Design[A]. Proceedings of the 5th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization[C]. Panama City Beach, FL, AIAA Paper94-4376, 1994,1117-1128.
  • 9GIUNTA A A, WATSON L T. A Comparison of Approximation Modeling Techniques: Polynomial Versus Interpolating Models[A]. 7th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidiscipli-nary Analysis & Optimization[C]. St. Louis, MO, AIAA, September 2-4, 1998, 1:392-404.
  • 10SOREN N. Lophaven, Hans Bruun Nielsen, Jacob Sondergaard. Aspects of the Matlab Toolbox DACE[A]. Report IMM-REP-2002-12, Informatics and Mathematical Modeling[DB/OL],Technical Univer-sity of Denmark,2002. http://www.imm.dtu.dk/-hbn/dace/.

共引文献319

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部