期刊文献+

制造商对供方缺陷改善投资的双源采购决策研究 被引量:10

Dual-sourcing procurement decisions in the presence of manufacturers' investment in suppliers' quality defect improvement
下载PDF
导出
摘要 研究在供需均随机的情况下,面对供应原料存在质量差异的两个供应商,制造商考虑对供方进行缺陷改善投资的双源采购决策问题.构建了制造商将高质量(缺陷率低)供应商作为缺陷改善低质量(缺陷率高)供应商的标杆,以求两供应商质量一致的双源采购决策模型.获得了制造商在先改善投资后订货与同时改善投资和订货两种策略下最优订货量,供应商最优生产量与他们的最优利润.分析了改善投资成功率对制造商订货量与利润的影响.研究发现:当改善投资成功率小于1时,先改善投资再订货时制造商利润比同时改善投资和订货时高;而改善投资成功率为1时,两种订货策略没有差异. Considering the uncertainty in supply and demand, as well as the quality differences of purchased products from two suppliers, this paper investigates dual-sourcing decisions with defect improvement investment in suppliers' product. In this paper, a high quality (low defect rate) supplier is set as a benchmark for quality defect improvement, and the manufacturer decides the purchasing policies based on two scenarios : ( 1 ) purchasing after defect improvement, (2) simultaneously purchasing and investing in defect improvement. The differences of the two scenarios are compared. The impacts of success rate of quality defect improvement investments on the order quantities and the profit of the manufacturer are analyzed. The results indicate that when the success rate is less than 1, the profit of the manufacturer in the first scenario ( purchasing after defect improvement) is higher than that in the second scenario (simultaneously purchasing and investing in defect improvement). When the success rate is equal to 1, there is no difference in the manufacturer' s profits in the two scenarios.
作者 陈崇萍 陈志祥 邵校 CHEN Chong-ping;CHEN Zhi-xiang;SHAO Xiao(School of Public Administration, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510006, China;School of Management, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China)
出处 《管理科学学报》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2017年第12期39-51,共13页 Journal of Management Sciences in China
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(71372154 71772191)
关键词 双源采购 缺陷改善投资 订货决策 标杆管理 制造-供应商关系 dual-sourcing procurement defect improvementmanagement manufacturer-suppliers relationshipinvestments order decisions benchmarking
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献87

  • 1魏权龄,吴海东,岳明.综合模型 C^2WY 中增减决策单元与DEA有效性[J].中国管理科学,1993,1(1):26-35. 被引量:5
  • 2帕特里夏 基利 等.公共部门标杆管理[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2002..
  • 3Banker, R.D.Estimating most productive scale size using DEA[J]. European Journal of Operational Research11984,17(1) :35 - 44.
  • 4魏权龄.评价相对有效性的DEA方法[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,1988..
  • 5李宗元.运筹学ABC[M].北京:经济管理出版社,2000..
  • 6Arthur D. Little Corporation, Executive Caravan TQM Survey Summary[ R]. Private Correspondence Dated, 10/15/1992 ( reported in Powell, 1995 ).
  • 7Ittner C, Lareker D. Total quality management and the choice of information and reward systems[ J]. Journal of Accounting Research, 1995, 33 : 1 - 34.
  • 8Hackman J R, Wageman R. Total quality management: Empirical, conceptual, and practical issues [ J ]. Administrative Sci- ence Quarterly, 1995, 40(2) : 309 -342.
  • 9Milgrom P, Roberts J. The economics of modem manufacturing: Technology, strategy, and organization[ J ]. American Eco- nomic Review, 1990, 80(3) : 511.
  • 10Wruck K H, Jensen M C. Science, specific knowledge, and total quality management [ J ]. Journal of Accounting and Eco- nomics, 1994, 18(3): 247-287.

共引文献58

同被引文献65

引证文献10

二级引证文献44

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部