期刊文献+

美国专利权穷竭原则的新进展--LexmarkInternational,Inc.v.ImpressionProducts,Inc案评析 被引量:1

The New Progress of the Doctrine of Patent Exhaustion--Case Study of Lexmark International,Inc. v. Impression Products,Inc
下载PDF
导出
摘要 2017年5月,美国最高法院就专利权穷竭原则能否适用于"售后限制"类销售以及合法的海外销售,根据普通法原则"拒绝对动产转让施加限制"全面推翻了联邦巡回上诉法院的判决和先例,明确了专利产品经销售将导致专利权绝对穷竭的态度,即存在"售后限制"协议的专利产品销售不能豁免于专利权穷竭,经专利权人授权的许可销售及合法的专利产品海外销售也将导致专利权穷竭,该判决影响深远。 The Supreme Court overruled the Federal Circuit's judgment in Lexmark Case and several previous cases in May this year, which concerning about whether patent exhaustion can be applied in "post-sale" restriction sales and authorized overseas sales. In the view of The Supreme Court, patent exhaustion is automatic and uniform regardless of any post-sale restrictions and geographical distinctions, as a result both "post-sale" restrictions sales and authorized overseas sales exhausts all rights under the Patent Act. Since it is the first time the Supreme Court give its definite answer about patent exhaustion in above two kinds of sales, which made Lexmark a significant case to study for the profound impacts of the Supreme Court's decisions.
作者 杨依锦 和育东 Yang Yijin;HeYudong(College of Humanities and Law Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing 100029, China)
出处 《北京化工大学学报(社会科学版)》 2017年第4期37-41,36,共6页 Journal of Beijing University of Chemical Technology(Social Sciences Edition)
关键词 专利权穷竭 售后限制 海外销售 doctrine of patent exhaustion post-sale restriction overseas sales
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献81

  • 1尹新天.从我国专利法看平行进口[J].中国专利与商标,2001(2):22-28. 被引量:2
  • 2常景龙.专利权穷竭制度的构成及其法理学分析[J].洛阳工学院学报(社会科学版),2001,19(1):36-40. 被引量:8
  • 3《专利法》第63条第1项规定
  • 4No. 06 - 937, Opinion of the Court Id at13.
  • 555 U.S. (14 How.) 539, 549 (1852).
  • 684U. S. (17 Wall.) (1873).
  • 7316 U.S. 241, 251 (1942).
  • 8Art. I, § 8, CI. 8; 35 U.S.C. §§ 31,40.
  • 9Cyrix Corp. v. Intel Corp. 846 F. Supp. 522, 540 (E. D. Tex 1994) , aff'd without op. , 42 F. 3d 1411 (Fed. Cir. 1994).
  • 10John W. Osborne:A Coherent View Of Patent Exhaustion: A Standard Based On Patentable Distinctiveness, Santa Clara Computer and High Technology Law Journal, March, 2004, Id at 675.

共引文献31

同被引文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部