期刊文献+

S.T.O.N.E.评分系统在输尿管结石体外冲击波碎石中的应用价值 被引量:3

Application of the S.T.O.N.E.score in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for patients with ureteral calculi
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 利用S.T.O.N.E.评分系统预测输尿管结石体外冲击波碎石的清除率,评估其效果及敏感性.方法 S.T.O.N.E.评分系统5个指标可通过泌尿系CT平扫等影像学检查得到:S为结石大小,T结石位于输尿管的位置,O梗阻情况(肾积水情况),N为结石数目,E结石硬度(CT值).应用S.T.O.N.E.评分系统对915例行体外碎石的输尿管结石患者进行回顾性评价,通过logistic回归预测模型,绘制ROC曲线,计算曲线下面积(AUC),评价S.T.O.N.E.评分预测的准确性,并计算敏感度,特异度.结果 结石清除率与S.T.O.N.E.评分呈负相关,评分越高结石清除率越低,S.T.O.N.E.评分AUC为0.955(P<0.001).结论 S.T.O.N.E.评分系统预测输尿管结石体外碎石的清除率,敏感性较高,有助于在输尿管结石体外碎石中评估和分析. Objective To predict clearance of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for patients with ureteral calculi by S.T.O.N.E.Score and to evaluate the effectiveness and sensitivity.Methods The S.T.O.N.E.Score consisted of 5 stone characteristics:(S) ize,(T) opography (location of stone),(O) bstruction,(N) umber of stones present,and (E) valuation of Hounsfield Units.The S.T.O.N.E.Score was applied to 915 patients with ureteral calculi who underwent extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for retrospective evaluation.The ROC curve,the area under the curve (AUC),and the accuracy of the S.T.O.N.E.score were evaluated by logistic regression model,and the sensitivity and specificity were calculated.Results Stone free rates (SFR) was found to be correlated to S.T.O.N.E.Score.As S.T.O.N.E.Score increased,the SFR decreased with a logical regression trend (P 〈 0.001).Conclusions The S.T.O.N.E.Score is a novel assessment tool to predict SFR in patients with ureteral calculi who undergo extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.The S.T.O.N.E.Score will help to future analysis of the treatment of urolithiasis.
出处 《国际泌尿系统杂志》 2017年第6期825-828,共4页 International Journal of Urology and Nephrology
关键词 输尿管结石 碎石术 Ureteral Calculi Lithotripsy
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献16

  • 1Wickham JE, Keller MJ. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy [ J]. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed), 1981, 283: 1571-1572.
  • 2Long Q, Guo J, Xu Z, et al. Experience of mini-percutaneous ncphrolithotomy in the treatment of large impacted proximal ure- teral stones [J]. Urol Int, 2013, 90: 384-388.
  • 3Okhunov Z, Friedlander JI, George AK, et al. S.T.O.N.E. neph- rolithometry: novel surgical classification system for kidney calcu- li [J]. Urology, 2013, 81: 1154-1159.
  • 4de la Rosette JJ, Opondo D, Daels FP, et al. Categorisation of complications and validation of the Clavien score for percutaneous nephrolithotomy [ J]. Eur Urol, 2012, 62: 246-255.
  • 5El-Nahas AR, Eraky I, Shokeir AA, et al. Factors affecting stone- free rate and complications of percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treatment of staghorn stone [J]. Urology, 2012, 79: 1236-1241.
  • 6Patel SR, Wells S, Ruma J, et al. Automated volumetric assess- ment by noncontrast computed tomography in the surveillance of nepbrolitlaiasis [J]. Urology, 2012, 80: 27-31.
  • 7Okhunov Z, Rais-Bahrami S, George AK, et al. The comparison of three renal tumor scoring systems: C-Index, P.A.D.U.A., and R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry scores [J]. J Endourol, 2011, 25: 1921-1924.
  • 8Zhu Z, Wang S, Xi Q, et al. Logistic regression model for pre- dicting stone-free rate after minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy [ J]. Urology, 2011, 78 : 32-36.
  • 9Mishra S, Sabnis RB, Desai M. Staghorn morphometry: a new tool for clinical classification and prediction model for percutane- ous nephrolithotomy monotherapy [J]. J Endourol, 2012, 26: 6- 14.
  • 10Thomas K, Smith NC, Hegarty N, et al. The Guy's stone score: grading the complexity of percutaneous nephrolithotomy proce- dures [J]. Urology, 2011, 78: 277-281.

共引文献34

同被引文献32

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部