五月风暴以来的后激进思想谱系

The Post-Radical Spectrum of Ideas since the May 1968 in France

后激进思想谱系是被纳入后现代主义图景中的马克思主义批判话语对五月风暴以来当代资本主义的后福特主义转型过程及其连锁效应进行病理诊断的直接产物。在它之中,围绕"Whither Marxism",主要存在两种不同的逻辑脉络。一种遵循后马克思主义的解构主义干预路径,突出当代资本主义社会转型的后现代基础,借由完全后现代主义化的逻辑根基,明确宣告后现代主义政治语法与马克思主义传统革命话语的彻底断裂。另一种则恪守新马克思主义的调和主义缝合立场,否认当代资本主义在根本性质上的实质改变,通过他们从后现代主义中确认的某些合理性原则,重建一种适合全新历史条件的马克思主义当代形态。前者立足后现代主义的根本原则彻底消解马克思主义的有效性,后者则致力于寻找马克思主义和后现代主义的历史连续性。从本质上看,二者都因后现代主义的形而上学规划、抽象而空洞的政治纲领以及审美化和乌托邦式的革命叙事,基本抽空了革命主体和人类解放的现实基础,不可避免地背离了马克思主义。

Marxist critical discourse has been included into the landscape of postmodernism,and the post-radical spectrum of ideas is the direct product of the diagnosis of this discourse on the postFordism transformation and its chain effects of contemporary capitalism since the May 1968 in France.Around"whither Marxism,"there are two different logical approaches.One is a path of post-Marxist deconstructivism that highlights the postmodern foundation of contemporary capitalist social transformation.On the basis of complete postmodernist logical foundation,it clearly declares the complete departure of the postmodernist political discourse from Marxist traditional revolutionary discourse.The other,abiding by neo-Marxist conciliationism,denies the substantive changes in nature of contemporary capitalism.Accepting some rational principles of postmodernism,it tries to reconstruct a contemporary Marxism suitable for new historical conditions.The former approach, using the fundamental principles of postmodernism,completely dissolves the efficacy of Marxism;while the latter focuses on finding the historical continuity between Marxism and postmodernism.Essentially,both basically ignore the real foundation of the revolutionary subject and the liberation of mankind due to their postmodern metaphysical planning,abstract and empty political program,and aesthetic and utopian revolutionary narratives.Therefore they inevitably deviate from Marxism.