网络服务提供者明知的法理学分析比较

A Comparative Study on the Knowledge of Internet Service Providers

网络服务提供者的"明知"指"明明知道","应知"指推定明知,而非"应当知道"。网络服务提供者概括性认识和具体性认识的区分在于是否有诱导侵权的故意;网络服务提供者明知的程度需达到高度盖然性认识,不是一般可能性认识;网络服务提供者明知的内容是对于犯罪行为的认识,不是对一般违法行为的认识;网络服务提供者明知推定的事实基础包含了充足条件和排除条件。我国的概括故意理论、全面性考察标准、违法犯罪区别说及可反驳的客观推定为网络服务提供者明知认定提供了依据,还可借鉴他国明知判断标准加以完善。快播公司、百度公司的不同际遇能检验网络服务提供者明知判断标准。

For ISPs, Knowledge means knowing obviously, and Should Have Known means Constructive Knowledge. The difference between the general cognition and specific cognition of network service providers lies in whether they have the intention of inducing infringement. The network service provider knows the degree required to achieve the high degree of probability knowledge, which is not the general possibility. The content that the network service provider knows is the understanding of the criminal behavior, not the understanding of the general illegal behavior; The fact basis of network service provider＇s presumption of knowledge contains sufficient conditions and exclusion conditions. Our objective presumption of general intention theory,comprehensive inspection standards, illegal crime and contradictable difference that provides the basis for the network service provider who knows perfectly well. It can also be improved by reference to other countries＇ judgment standards. The different experience of QVOD company and Baidu company can test the judging criteria of the knowledge of ISPs.