影视作品信息网络传播侵权事实及责任界定——作品信息网络传播权侵权案件评析

Definition of Online Dissemination Tort Facts and Liabilities on Film and Television Works——Infringement Case Analysis of Online Dissemination

网络服务提供者对来源于未经授权的第三方的影视资源疏于履行监管责任,存在编辑、推荐等行为,构成帮助侵权。帮助侵权的基础是存在直接侵权行为,适用服务器标准判定直接侵权行为存在,是对由此产生的间接侵权及帮助侵权行为认定的前提。对影视作品而言,信息网络传播权权利人证明他人传播了其享有权利的"影视作品"是证实侵权事实存在的第一步。本案权利人虽保全了被诉侵权网站截屏、文件下载进度等信息,但没有保存作品片段,造成人民法院在认定是否存在传播涉案作品事实方面出现困难,本案审判通过结合相关证据对涉案每部影视作品的传播行为进行精细分析,区别作出不同判定。

Web service provider neglects his supervision obligation who edits and popularizes the third party＇s film and movie works without authorization, which forms an aiding infringement. Direct infringement, served as the premise of its consequent indirect infringement and contributory infringement, is judged by the server standards. To the film and television works concerned, the owner of online information must prove other party＇s dissemination of his works as the fundamental evidence of direct infringement. In this case, although the holder of this case has saved the information of the infringed websites, such as the screen capture and the progress of the document downloaded, he/she hasn＇t saved the fragments of the works, so it is difficult for the people＇s court to determine whether the facts of the works involved are spread or not. In this trial, the author makes a detailed analysis of the spread of each film and television works in accordance with relevant evidence, and makes a distinction between different judgments.