期刊文献+

16F胃管作为胸腔引流管对肺癌术后患者疼痛影响的对照研究 被引量:15

Effect of 16F gastric tube as thoracic drainage tube on pain relief in patients after lung cancer resection:A controlled trial
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨16F胃管在肺癌术后加速康复中对患者疼痛的影响。方法连续选取我院2015年1月至2016年5月行肺癌根治术的118例患者,分为16F胃管组[16F组,60例,男30例、女30例,年龄41~73(52.13±7.83)岁]和28F引流管组[28F组,58例,男25例、女33例,年龄45~75(55.62±4.27)岁]。比较两组临床效果。结果两组在术后带管时间[(4.47±1.03)d vs.(4.24±1.16)d,P=0.473]、胸腔积液引流总量[(560.37±125.00)ml vs.(656.03±132.45)ml,P=0.478]、胸腔积气(5/60,4/58,P=0.439)、胸腔积液(6/60,3/58,P=0.522)、皮下气肿(3/60 vs.1/58,P=0.635)发生率差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);16F组术后引流管口疼痛较28F组轻,差异有统计学意义(F=4 242.996,P<0.001),16F胃管组所使用止痛药次数也明显少于28F引流管组(12/60 vs.26/58,P=0.004)。结论 16F胃管在肺癌术后对胸腔引流、促进肺膨胀的效果与28F引流管相当,但16F胃管所引起的伤口疼痛明显小于28F引流管。 Objective To explore the effect of 16 F gastric tube on pain relief in postoperative lung cancer patients.Methods A total of 118 lung cancer patients were treated with radical resection of lung cancer in our hospital between January 2015 and May 2016.The patients were assigned into two groups: a 16 F gastric tube group(16 F group,60 patients,30 males and 30 females at age of 41-73(52.13±7.83) years and a 28 F drainage tube group(28 F group,58 patients,25 males and 33 females at age of 45-75(55.62±4.27) years.Clinical effects were compared between the two groups.Results There was no statistical difference in drainage time(4.47±1.03 d vs.4.24±1.16 d,P=0.473),drainage amount(560.37±125.00 ml vs.656.03±132.45 ml,P=0.478),incidences of pneumothorax(5/60 vs.2/58,P=0.439),pleural effusion(6/60 vs.3/58,P=0.522),and subcutaneous emphysema(3/60 vs.1/58,P=0.635) between the two groups(P〉0.05).The pain caused by the drainage tube in the16 F group was less than that in the 28 F drainage tube group with a statistical difference(F=4 242.996,P〈0.001).The frequency of taking analgesics in the 16 F group was significantly less than that in the 28 F group(12/60 vs.26/58,P〈0.001).Conclusion The effects of draining pleural effusions and promoting lung recruitment are similar between the 16 F group and the 28 F group.However,the wound pain caused by 16 F gastric tube is significantly less than that by 28 F drainage tube.
出处 《中国胸心血管外科临床杂志》 CAS CSCD 2018年第1期63-66,共4页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
基金 广西壮族自治区高等学校科学研究课题资助项目(KY2015LX053)
关键词 胃管 引流管 加速康复 肺癌 Gastric tube drainage tube enhanced recovery after surgery lung cancer
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献62

  • 1LiJS. Systemic cognition to connotation of FTS. National MedJ Chin, 2007, 87(8): 515-517.
  • 2Jiang zw, Li N, LiJS, et al. On conception and clinical significance of FTS.J Chin Mod Surg, 2007, 27(2): 131-133.
  • 3Kehlet H, Wilmore DW. Multimodal strategies to improve surgical outcome. AmJ Surg, 2002, 183(6): 630-641.
  • 4Basse L, Raskov HH, Hiort Jakobsen D, et al. Accelerated postoperative re- covery program after colonic resection improves physical performance, pul- monary function and body composition. BrJ Surg, 2002, 89(4): 446-453.
  • 5Henriksen MG, Jensen MB, Hansen HV, et al. Enforced mobilization, early oral feeding, and balanced analgesia improve convalescence after colorectal surgery. Nutrition, 2002, 18(2): 147-152.
  • 6Basse L, Madsen JL, Kehlet H. Normal gastrointestinal transit after colonic resection using epidural analgesia, enforced oral nutrition and laxative. Br J Surg, 2001, 88(11): 1498-1500.
  • 7Basse L, Hiort Jakobsen D, Billesbolle P, et al. A clinical pathway to accelerate recovery after colonic resection. Ann Surg, 2000, 232 (1): 51-57.
  • 8LiJS. Nutrition and fast track surgery. J Parenter Enteral Nutr~ 2007, 14(2): 65-67.
  • 9Sreide E, Eriksson LI, Hirlekar G, et al. Pre-operative fasting guidelines: an update. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 2005, 49(8): 1041 - 1047.
  • 10Soop M, Nygren J, Myrenfors P, et al. Preoperative oral carbohydrate treatment attenuates immediate postoperative insulin resistance. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, 2001, 280(4): 576-583.

共引文献209

同被引文献155

引证文献15

二级引证文献70

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部