期刊文献+

优质护理干预对降低鼻咽癌患者调强放疗后口腔黏膜反应的影响 被引量:21

Effect of high quality nursing intervention on reducing oral mucosal response in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma after intensity modulated radiation therapy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:观察优质护理干预对降低鼻咽癌患者调强放疗后口腔黏膜反应的影响。方法:选取2015年3月~2017年6月我院行调强放疗的鼻咽癌患者60例为研究对象,采用随机数字表法将其等分为观察组与对照组,对照组在放疗期间行传统放疗,观察组在此基础上给予优质护理干预,对比两组临床疗效及护理干预前后口腔黏膜反应程度;应用恶性肿瘤特异性生命质量测定量表、疼痛数字评分法、自我护理能力量表评价两组生活质量、疼痛度、自我护理能力。结果:给予优质护理干预后,观察组临床治疗效果高于对照组(P<0.05);口腔黏膜反应程度低于对照组(P<0.05);恶性肿瘤特异性生命质量评分、自我护理能力评分均高于对照组(P<0.05),而疼痛评分较对照组显著降低(P<0.05)。结论:优质护理干预有利于降低鼻咽癌患者调强放疗后口腔黏膜反应及疼痛度,明显提高其生活质量及自我护理能力,值得在临床推广应用。 Objective: To observe the effect of high quality nursing intervention on reducing oral mucosal response in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma after intensity modulated radiation therapy( IMRT). Methods: To select 60 patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma who received IMRT in our hospital from March 2015 to March 2017. They were divided into observation group and control group by random number table. The malignant tumor specific quality of life scale,numerical rating scale,and self-care ability scale were used to evaluate the quality of life,pain and self-care ability of the two groups. Results:After giving the high quality nursing intervention,the effect of clinical treatment in the observation group was higher than that in the control group( P 〈 0.05). The degree of oral mucosa reaction was lower than that of control group( P 〈 0. 05). The scores of malignant tumor specific quality of life scale and self-care ability were higher than those of control group( P 〈 0. 05),but the scores of NRS were significantly lower than those of control group( P 〈 0. 05).Conclusion: High quality nursing intervention could reduce the oral mucosa reaction and pain of nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients after IMRT,improve their quality of life and self-care ability,and it was worthy of clinical application.
出处 《护理实践与研究》 2017年第24期108-110,共3页 Nursing Practice and Research
关键词 优质护理干预 鼻咽癌 调强放疗 口腔黏膜反应 High quality nursing intervention Nasopharyngeal carcinoma Intensity modulated radiation therapy Oral mucosal response
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献119

  • 1韩非,卢泰祥,赵充,卢丽霞,黄劭敏,邓小武.放疗后局部复发的鼻咽癌调强放疗的预后分析[J].中华放射肿瘤学杂志,2006,15(4):244-248. 被引量:46
  • 2王伶俐,戚向敏,颜世果,宗晓明.纤维粘连蛋白在口腔粘膜白斑中的表达[J].山东大学学报(医学版),2006,44(10):985-988. 被引量:3
  • 3Jawad H, Hodson NA, Nixon PJ. A review of dental treatment of head and neck cancer patients, before, during and after radiothera- py:Part 1 [J]. Br Dent J,2015,218(2) :65 -68.
  • 4Yonekita H, Takase H, Ogata K, et al. The timing of the appearance of oral mucositis induced by concurrent chemoradiotherapy with S - 1 for head and neck cancer[ J]. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho,2014,41 ( 13 ) :2571 - 2575.
  • 5Bossola M. Nutritional interventions in head and neck cancer pa- tients undergoing chemoradiotherapy: A narrative review [ J ]. Nu- trients ,2015,7 ( 1 ) :265 - 276.
  • 6Hayashi H, Kobayashi R, Suzuki A, et al. Polaprezinc prevents o- ral mucositis in patients treated with high - dose chemotherapy fol- lowed by hematopoietic stem cell transplantation [ J ]. Anticancer Res,2014,34(12) :7271 -7277.
  • 7Mclean M,Chow E,O Sullivan B, et al . Re-irradiation for lo- cally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma [J]. Radiother Oncol, 1998,48(2) :209-211.
  • 8Yang TS,Ng KT, Wang HM, et al . Prognostic factors of lo- coregionally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma-a retrospec- tive review of 182 cases [J]. Am J Clin Oncol, 1996,19(4): 337-343.
  • 9Lee AW, Poon YF, Foo W, et al. Retrospective analysis of 5037 patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated during 1976-1985: overall survival and patterns of failure[J]. Int J Ratiat Oncol Biol Phys, 1992,33 (2) : 261-270.
  • 10Qiu S, Lin S, Tham IW, et a! .Intensity modulated radiation therapy in the salvage of locally recurrent nasopharyngeal car- cinoma[J]. Int Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2012,76(2):676- 683.

共引文献134

同被引文献169

引证文献21

二级引证文献69

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部