摘要
最高人民法院公布的《关于适用〈中华人民共和国婚姻法〉若干问题的解释(二)的补充规定》在司法实践中起到的作用尚待检验,但《关于适用〈中华人民共和国婚姻法〉若干问题的解释(二)》第二十四条及相关条文确立的夫妻共同债务"时间标准"推定规则不改变,举债方配偶的合法权益可能受到侵害的困境就难以得到有效改善。在涉及夫妻共同债务认定的外部法律关系中,应区分日常夫妻共同债务与特殊夫妻共同债务,在此基础上对夫妻共同债务的认定采取不同的证明责任分配方式。同时,应在特殊夫妻共同债务情形下提高债权人的注意、审查义务,实施"共债共签"。
The role of “ Supplementary Provisions on the Interpretation of Some Issues on the Application of the Marriage Law of the Peoples Republic of China (Ⅱ) ” announced by the Supreme Peoples Court remains tojudicial practice, but the “ time standard” presumption of the joint debt of couple established by Article 24 and therelevant provisions does not change, so it is difficult to effectively improve the plight thinterests of the debtors spouse may be infringed upon. In the external legal relationship involving the identification of the joint debt between husband and wife, the common debt of couple should be distinguished from the special debt. On this basis , the identification of the joint debt of couple should take different ways of distribuof proof. Meanwhile , in the case of special joint debt of couple , we should improve the attention and reviewtion of the creditor , and implement “common debt co signature ”.
出处
《山西省政法管理干部学院学报》
2018年第1期62-65,共4页
Journal of Shanxi Politics and Law Institute for Administrators
关键词
夫妻共同债务
外部法律关系
证明责任
joint debts of couple
external legal relationship
burden of proof