粘捕式灭蝇器与电击式灭蝇器使用效果对比

Fly capture effect of the sticky trap and the electric shock device

目的比较粘捕式灭蝇器与电击式灭蝇器的灭蝇效果。方法模拟室内试验。结果分别连续使用1、4、8、12 h,电击式灭蝇器的灭蝇率分别为78.5%、90.5%、91.5%、87%,粘捕式灭蝇器的灭蝇率分别为75.5%、91%、89.5%、85.5%;平均灭蝇情况电击式灭蝇器的灭蝇率为86.88%,粘捕式灭蝇器的灭蝇率为85.38%。结论粘捕式灭蝇器与电击式灭蝇器的效果相当,但粘捕式灭蝇器在餐饮服务单位中使用更加安全。

Objective To compare the fly capture effect between the sticky trap type fly killer and the electric shock type fly killing device.Methods Simulating experiment in a room. Results By using for 1,4,8 and 12 hours,the rates of killing flies were 78. 5%,90. 5%,91. 5% and 87% when the electric shock device was applied,and 75. 5%,91%,89. 5% and 85. 5% while the sticky traps were used. The average killing rate of electric shock device was86. 88%,while the sticky trap was 85.33%.Conclusion The effect of the sticky trap type fly killer is similar to the effect of the electric shock type fly killing device,and it is safer to use the sticky trap type fly killer in some food serving area.