期刊文献+

VITA树脂嵌体修复儿童和青少年第一磨牙缺损的临床评价 被引量:6

Clinical evaluation of VITA resin inlay on restoration of the first permanent molars for children and adolescents
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评价VITA树脂嵌体修复儿童和青少年第一恒磨牙大面积缺损的临床疗效。方法选择6~16岁儿童和青少年大面积缺损的第一恒磨牙178颗,随机分为2组,试验组采用VITA树脂嵌体修复,对照组采用复合树脂直接充填,术后1年复查,评价临床疗效,应用SPSS 16.0软件包进行统计学分析。结果试验组的修复成功率为97.78%,高于对照组(84.09%),有显著性差异(P<0.01)。试验组和对照组的上下颌牙的治疗有效率无统计学差异(P>0.05)。试验组的男女孩治疗有效率无显著性差异(P>0.05),而对照组男孩治疗有效率明显低于女孩(P<0.01)。结论 VITA树脂嵌体修复牙体大面积缺损的临床疗效显著优于树脂直接充填,能满足临床需求。 Objective To evaluate the clinical effects of VITA resin inlay on restoration of the badly broken-down first permanent molars for children and adolescents. Methods 178 badly broken-down first permanent molars aged from 6 to 16 years old were selected and randomly assigned into 2 groups. VITA resin inlay restorations were used in the test group,composite resin direct fillings were used in the control group. Clinical assessment was made after treatment one year later. All data were statistically analyzed by SPSS 16.0.Results The restoration success rate of test group was 97. 78%,significantly higher than that of control group 84. 09%(P 〈0. 01).There was no significant difference in maxillary and mandible teeth between test group and control group(P〉0.05). There was no significant difference in effective rate between male and female in the test group(P 〉0.05),but the restoration success rate of male was significantly lower than that of female in the control group(P〈0.01). Conclusion The clinical effects of VITA resin inlay on restoration of the badly broken-down molar are superior to composite resin direct filling. The clinical requirement can be satisfied.
出处 《口腔医学》 CAS 2017年第12期1075-1078,共4页 Stomatology
基金 杭州市科技发展计划项目(20130633B35)
关键词 VITA树脂嵌体 第一磨牙 修复 复合树脂 VITA resin inlay the first permanent molar restoration composite resin
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献33

  • 1谭建国.美学嵌体的临床新进展[J].中国实用口腔科杂志,2009,2(12):719-720. 被引量:29
  • 2彭敏,朱智敏,杨小民.283例食物嵌塞患者情况调查分析[J].口腔医学研究,2005,21(4):462-464. 被引量:30
  • 3陈溯,张振庭.计算机辅助设计与计算机辅助制作后牙修复体的三年临床观察及失败病例分析[J].中华口腔医学杂志,2007,42(6):337-339. 被引量:6
  • 4Ryge G. Clinical criteria[J]. Int Dent J, 1980,30(4) :347 -358.
  • 5Sengun A, Ozer F, Unlu N, et al. Shear bond strengths of tooth fragments reattached or restored [ J ]. J Oral Rehabil, 2003,30 (1) :82 -86.
  • 6Cardoso PE, Placido E, Moura SK. Microleakage of four simplified adhesive systems under thermal and mechanical stresses [J]. Am J Dent, 2002,15(3) :164- 168.
  • 7Powell LV, Gordon GE, Johnson GH. Clinical comparison of Class V resin composite and glass ionomer restorations[J]. Am J Dent, 1992,5(5) :249 -252.
  • 8Kijsamanmith K, Timpawat S, Harnirattisai C, et al. Microtensile bond strengths of bonding agents to pulpal floor dentine [J]. Int Endod J , 2002,35(10) :833 -839.
  • 9Kaaden C, Powers JM, Friedl KH, et al. Bond strength of self -etching adhesives to dental hard tissues[J]. Clin Oral Investig,2002,6( 3 ) : 155 - 160.
  • 10Santana IL,Lodovici E,Matos JR,et al.Effect of experimental heattreatment on mechanical properties of rresin composites[J].BrazDent J,2009,20(3):205-210.

共引文献65

同被引文献60

引证文献6

二级引证文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部