期刊文献+

腰硬联合麻醉与硬膜外麻醉用于分娩镇痛效果的比较 被引量:5

Comparison of effect of combined spinal epidural anesthesia and epidural anesthesia for labor analgesia
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:比较腰硬联合麻醉与硬膜外麻醉在分娩镇痛中的效果。方法:收治分娩镇痛产妇60例,随机分为腰硬联合组(Ⅰ组)和硬膜外组(Ⅱ组),比较两组麻醉效果。结果:两组新生儿出生后1、5、10 min Apgar评分差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。与镇痛前比较,Ⅰ组产妇较Ⅱ组在注入首剂量后3 min、5 min、10 min时VAS评分明显降低(P<0.05);15 min时Ⅱ组达到满意镇痛效果,两组比较,VAS评分差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组产妇第一、二产程及总产程时间比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:腰硬联合阻滞在分娩镇痛中较硬膜外麻醉镇痛起效快,对产程、新生儿无不良影响。 Objective:To explore the effect of combined spinal epidural anesthesia and epidural anesthesia for labor analgesia.Methods:60 parturients with labor analgesia were selected.They were randomly divided into the combined spinal epidural anesthesia group(Ⅰ group) and the epidural anesthesia group(Ⅱ group).We compared the anesthetic effects between the two groups.Results:There were no significant differences in Apgar score between groups at 1,5 and 10 minutes after birth(P>0.05).Compared with before analgesia,the VAS score of the Ⅰ group was significantly lower compared with the Ⅱ group at 3 minutes,5 minutes,10 minutes after injection first dose(P<0.05).At 15 minutes,the analgesic effect was satisfactory in the Ⅱ group,there was no significant difference in VAS score between groups(P>0.05).There were no statistical significances of the first and second stage of labor and the total labor time of the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusion:Compared with epidural analgesia,the effect of combined spinal epidural block in labor analgesia was rapid,and it had no adverse effect on the labor process and the newborn.
出处 《中国社区医师》 2018年第1期46-47,共2页 Chinese Community Doctors
关键词 分娩镇痛 腰硬联合麻醉 布比卡因 罗哌卡因 Labor analgesia Combined spinal epidural anesthesia Bupivacaine Ropivacaine
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献7

共引文献13

同被引文献49

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部