期刊文献+

盆腔淋巴结计数的应用解剖学研究及其临床意义 被引量:1

Applied anatomy study of pelvic lymph node count and its clinical significance
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 探讨根治性膀胱全切术中盆腔不同清扫范围内淋巴结的清扫数目作为衡量盆腔淋巴结清扫(PLND)手术质量标准的可行性.方法 在19具成人尸体标本上模拟行超扩大PLND术,并将范围分为标准、扩大、超扩大3级及10个解剖区域,对每个区域淋巴结分别清扫及计数.计算超扩大、扩大和标准清扫解剖区域之内清除的淋巴结总数目及其变异系数(CV).结果 超扩大PLND术产生的淋巴结数目29~72个,平均(46.1±12.5)个;扩大清扫为23~69个,平均(41.3±10.8)个;标准清扫为18~39个,平均(28.9±7.2)个;CV分别为27.2%、26.2%与25.1%.结论 盆腔各解剖区域淋巴结数目存在较大的个体差异.在根治性膀胱切除术中,应用最低淋巴结计数作为衡量PLND手术质量标准的合理性和可行性需进一步探讨. Objective To determine the number, variability and distribution of pelvic lymph nodes to better understand the utility of the node count as a surrogate for the dissection extent at radical cystectomy for bladder cancer.Methods Super-extended pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) was performed on 19 human cadavers, and the lymph nodes within each of 10 dissection zones were enumerated respectively .The mean, standard deviation and range of nodal yield within each dissection region were calculated .The super-extended and standard dissection templates were compared using the paired t test .The coefficient of variation (CV) were 27.2%, 26.2% and 25.1% respectively.Results Super-extended PLND yielded a mean of 46.1 ±12.5 lymph nodes, with a total node count range of 29 -72 nodes.Extended PLND yielded a mean of 41.3 ±10.8 lymph nodes, with a total node count range of 23 -69 nodes.In contrast, the nodal yield within the standard template was 28.9 ±7.2 lymph nodes, nodes with a range of 18 -39 nodes. Conclusions There are substantial interindividual differences about the lymph nodes counts in the pelvic cavity.These results have demonstrated the further exploration of lymph node count as a surrogate for the dissection extent.
出处 《中华解剖与临床杂志》 2017年第6期462-466,共5页 Chinese Journal of Anatomy and Clinics
关键词 膀胱肿瘤 淋巴结切除术 淋巴结 尸体解剖 Urinary bladder neoplasms Lymph node excision Lymph nodes Autopsy
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献22

  • 1Yafi FA, Aprikian AG, Fradet Y, et al. Surveillance guidelines based on recurrence patterns after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: the Canadian Bladder Cancer Network experience. BJU Int,2012,110:1317-1323.
  • 2Hautmann RE, de Petrieoni RC, F'feiffer C, et al. Radical cystectomy for urothelial carcinoma of the bladder without neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy: long-term results in 1100 patients. Eur Urol,2012,61:1039-1047.
  • 3Lee EK, Herr HW, Dickstein RJ, et al. Lymph node density for patient counselling about prognosis and for designing clinical trials of adjuvant therapies after radical cystectomy. BJU Int,2012,110 ( 11 Pt B ) : E590-E595.
  • 4Rink M, Hansen J, Cha EK, et al. Outcomes and prognostic factors in patients with a single lymph node metastasis at time of radical cystectomy. BJU Int,2013,111:74-84.
  • 5Stamatakis L, Godoy G, Lemer SP. Innovations in radical cysteetomy and pelvic lymph node dissection. Semin Oneol,2012, 39:573-582.
  • 6Yuh BE, Nazmy M, Ruel NH, et al. Standardized analysis of frequency and severity of complications after robot-assisted radical eystectomy. Eur Urol,2012,62:806-813.
  • 7Gordetsky J, Seosyrev E, Rashid H, et al. Identifying additional lymph node in radical eystectomy lymphadenectomy specimens. Mod Patho1,2012,25 : 140-144.
  • 8Dangle PP, Gong MC, Bahnson RR, et al. How do commonly performed lymphadeneetomy templates influence bladder cancer nodal stage?. J Urol, 2010,183:499-503.
  • 9Sobin DH, Witteking Ch. TNM classification of malignant tumours. 6th ed. New York : Wiley-Liss, 2002 : 199-202.
  • 10Miocinovic R, Gong MC, Ghoneim IA, et al. Presacral and retroperitoneal lymph node involvement in urothelieal bladder cancer: results of a prospective mapping study. J Urol,2011,186 : 1269-1273.

共引文献7

同被引文献9

引证文献1

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部