期刊文献+

伊立替康联合奈达铂二线治疗复发广泛期小细胞肺癌 被引量:3

Irinotecan combined with nedaplatin second-line for the treatment of recurrent extensive small cell lung cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察伊立替康注射液联合奈达铂化疗方案二线治疗复发广泛期小细胞肺癌(SCLC)的安全性和疗效。方法 39例复发或进展的SCLC患者,采用伊立替康注射液联合奈达铂二线治疗,其中伊立替康90 mg/m2静脉滴注,d1、8,奈达铂25 mg/m2静脉滴注,d1、2、3。每28天为1个周期,每2个化疗周期后进行疗效评价。结果 39例患者均完成2个周期以上化疗,其中完全缓解(CR)5例(12.8%),部分缓解(PR)12例(30.8%),疾病稳定(SD)11例(28.2%),疾病进展(PD)11例(28.2%)。客观缓解率(ORR)为43.6%。39例患者主要毒副反应为血液学毒性和消化道反应。其中肝功能损害发生率为35.9%,均为Ⅰ、Ⅱ度;肾功能损害发生率为10.3%,均为Ⅰ、Ⅱ度;中性粒细胞减少发生率为56.4%,其中Ⅰ、Ⅱ度为25.6%,Ⅲ、Ⅳ度为30.8%;血小板减少发生率为38.5%,其中Ⅰ、Ⅱ度为30.8%,Ⅲ、Ⅳ度为7.7%;血红蛋白下降发生率为23.1%,其中Ⅰ、Ⅱ度为15.4%,Ⅲ、Ⅳ度为7.7%;发热发生率为12.8%,其中Ⅰ、Ⅱ度为7.7%,Ⅲ、Ⅳ度为5.1%;疲乏发生率为23.1%,均为Ⅰ、Ⅱ度;恶心呕吐发生率为56.4%,其中Ⅰ、Ⅱ度为41.0%,Ⅲ、Ⅳ度为15.4%;腹泻发生率为46.2%,其中Ⅰ、Ⅱ度为38.5%,Ⅲ、Ⅳ度为7.7%。全组无毒性相关死亡。结论伊立替康联合奈达铂化疗方案二线治疗复发性广泛期SCLC有一定的安全性和疗效。 Objective To observe the safety and efficacy of irinotecan injection combined with nedaplatin second-line chemotherapy in the treatment of recurrent extensive small cell lung cancer(SCLC). Methods A total of 39 patients with recurrent or progressive SCLC were treated with irinotecan injection combined with nedaplatin second-line therapy, including intravenous infusion of irinotecan 90 mg/m2 at d1 and d8, intravenous infusion of nedaplatin at d1, d 2, d3. Every 28 days for a cycle, and the efficacy was evaluated after every 2 cycles of chemotherapy. Results 39 patients completed 2 cycles of chemotherapy, including 5 complete remission(CR) cases(12.8%), 12 partial remission(PR) cases(30.8%), 11 stable disease(SD) cases(28.2%), 11 disease progression(PD) cases(28.2%), with objective remission rate(ORR) as 43.6%. The main toxic and side effects of 39 patients were hematological toxicity and digestive tract reaction. The incidence of liver function damage was 35.9%, all of which were Ⅰ and Ⅱ degree, and the rate of renal function damage was 10.3%, which were all Ⅰ and Ⅱ degree. The incidence of neutrophils was 56.4%, with Ⅰ and Ⅱ degree as 25.6%, and Ⅲ and Ⅳ degree as 30.8%. The incidence of thrombocytopenia was 38.5%, with Ⅰ and Ⅱ degree as 30.8%, and Ⅲ and Ⅳ degree as 7.7%. The incidence of hemoglobin decline was 23.1%, with Ⅰ and Ⅱ degree as 15.4%, and Ⅲ and Ⅳ degree as 7.7%. The incidence of fever was 12.8%, with Ⅰ and Ⅱ degree as 7.7%, and III and Ⅳ degree as 5.1%. The incidence of fatigue was 23.1%, all of which were Ⅰ and Ⅱ degree. The incidence of nausea and vomiting was 56.4%, with Ⅰ and Ⅱ degree as 41.0%, and Ⅲ and Ⅳ degree as 15.4%. The incidence of diarrhoea was 46.2%, with Ⅰ and Ⅱ degree as 38.5%, and III and Ⅳ degree as 7.7%. There was no toxic related deaths in this group. Conclusion Combination of irinotecan and nedaplatin second-line chemotherapy provides certain safety and efficacy in treating recurrent extensive.
作者 宋波
出处 《中国现代药物应用》 2018年第1期83-84,共2页 Chinese Journal of Modern Drug Application
关键词 小细胞肺癌 化疗 伊立替康 奈达铂 Small cell lung cancer Chemotherapy Irinotecan Nedaplatin
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献46

  • 1孙燕,石远凯.内科肿瘤学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2007:785-788.
  • 2孙燕,石元凯.临床肿瘤内科手册[M].4版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2008:147-160.
  • 3Kitagawa M, Oguro A, Kondo Y, et al. A case of S-1-resistant gastric cancer with multiple bone metastases and disseminated intravascular coagulation: effective treatment by combined chemotherapy with CDDP and CPT-11[J]. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho, 2010,37(1) : 165-168.
  • 4Bae S H, Ryoo H M, Do Y R. et al. A phase Ⅱ study of biweekly irinotecan and cisplatin for patients with extensive stage disease small cell lung cancer[J]. Lung Cancer, 2008,59 ( 1 ) : 76- 80.
  • 5Noda K, Nishiwaki Y, Kawahara M, et al. Irinotecan plus cisplatin compared with etoposide plus cisplatin for extensive small cell lung cancer[J].N Engl J Med,2002,346(2) :85-91.
  • 6Hanna N, Bunn P A Jr, Langer C, et al. Randmuized phaseⅢ trial comparing irinotecan/cisplatin with etoposide/cisplatin in patients with previously untreated extensive-stage disease small- cell lung cancer[J]. J Clin Oncol,2006,24(13):2038-2043.
  • 7Cao W, Xu C, Lou G, et al. A Phase II study of paclitaxel and nedaplatin as first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced esophageal cancer[ J]. Japanese journal of clinical oncalogy,2009, 39(9) : 582.
  • 8Zheng J, Wang G, Yang GY, et ah Induction chemotherapy with nedaplatin with 5-FU followed by intensity-modulated radiotherapy concurrent with chemotherapy for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma[ J]. Japanese Journal of clinical oncology,2010, 40(5) : 425.
  • 9Roth BJ, Johnson DH, Einhorn LH,et al. Randomized study of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and vincristine versus etoposide and cisplatin versus alternation of these two regimens in extensive smallcen lung cancer: a phase III trial of the Southeastern Cancer Study Group[J]. Journal of clinical oncology, 1992, 10(2) :282.
  • 10Sundstrom S. Cisplatin and etoposide regimen Is superior to cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and vincristine regimen in small-cell lung cancer: results from a randomized phase IIl trial with 5 years'follow-Up [ J ]. Journal of clinical oncology,2002, 20(24) : 4665-4672.

共引文献48

同被引文献16

引证文献3

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部