期刊文献+

董事会异质性与IPO绩效:冲突与经验的协同视角 被引量:1

Board Heterogeneity and IPO Performance:a Synergistic Perspective of Conflict and Experience
原文传递
导出
摘要 资源依赖理论认为董事会成员间的异质性可以给企业带来更多的行业经验和社会资源,有利于企业的价值创造;而代理理论认为董事会异质性将导致董事会成员产生更大的冲突、提高沟通成本,从而不利于企业绩效。本文认为这两个理论对解释董事会异质性的作用时是互补的,当异质性低的时候,资源依赖理论更起作用;当异质性高的时候,代理理论作用更显著。基于中国创业板上市公司样本数据,研究发现董事会异质性对IPO绩效的影响存在非线性倒U关系,低异质性董事会的经验问题及高异质性董事会的冲突问题都不利于企业IPO绩效,而且企业规模将强化这种倒U关系。 The heterogeneity of board of directors can bring more industry experience and social resources to the enterprise that is helpful to the enterprise's value creation based on the resource dependence theory; and agency theory thinks that the board of directors heterogeneity will lead to conflicts between directors, which is not conducive to enterprise performance. This paper considers that the two theories are complementary in explaining the effect of heterogeneity the board of directors. When heterogeneity is low, the resource dependence theory is more important; for high heterogeneity scene, agency theory play more significant role.Based on the sample of Chinese listed companies,the study found that the relationship between heterogeneity of the board of directors and IPO performance is the inverted U, and the scale of enterprises will strengthen the relationship.
作者 汪丽
机构地区 南京大学商学院
出处 《南大商学评论》 CSSCI 2017年第3期121-133,共13页 Nanjing Business Review
基金 教育部人文社科项目“创业者信念结构对创业企业风险承担的影响机理:信息处理过程视角的研究”(17YJA630095)的资助
关键词 董事会 异质性 IPO绩效 冲突、经验 board of directors heterogeneity IPOPerformance conflict experience
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献19

  • 1张必武,石金涛.国外高管团队人口特征与企业绩效关系研究新进展[J].外国经济与管理,2005,27(6):17-23. 被引量:43
  • 2张平.高层管理团队异质性与企业绩效关系研究[J].管理评论,2006,18(5):54-61. 被引量:96
  • 3魏刚,肖泽忠,Nick Travlos,邹宏.独立董事背景与公司经营绩效[J].经济研究,2007,42(3):92-105. 被引量:285
  • 4Dalzi T,Gentry R J,Bowerman M.An Integrated Agency-resource Dependent View of the Influence of Directors’Human and Relational Capital on Firm R&D Spending.Journal of Management Studies,2011.
  • 5Certo S T.Influencing Initial Public Offering Investors with Prestige:Signaling with Board Structures.Academy of Management Review,2003.
  • 6Anderson R C,Reeb D M,Upadhyay A,et al.The Economics of Director Heterogeneity.Financial Management,2011.
  • 7Ljungqvist,A.and Wilhelm W.IPO Allocation:Discriminatory or Discretionary?Journal of Financial Economics,2002.
  • 8Anson L.K.Wong,Miehael C.S.Wong,Examining the Performance of Venture-Backed Companies in the Hong Kong IPO Market.The Journal of Private Equity,2008.
  • 9Carpenter M A.The Implications of Strategy and Social Context for the Relationship between Ttop Management Team Heterogeneity and Firm Performance.Strategic Management Journal,2002.
  • 10Smith W K,Tushman M L.Managing Strategic Contradictions A Top Management Model for Managing Innovation Streams.Organiztion Science,2005.

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部