期刊文献+

论ICSID管辖权要求下的适格投资

Qualified Investment within Jurisdiction of ICSID
下载PDF
导出
摘要 ICSID是目前解决因国际投资引起的法律争议的主要仲裁机构,其仲裁管辖权以当事国的同意和适格投资的认定为基础,但二者之中争议较大的是适格投资的判断。结合ICSID案例来看,投资条约对投资的定义包括一般意义和法律意义上的定义,同时,ICSID管辖权下适格投资应具备一定条件。基于此,我国应当准确把握适格投资判断标准未来的发展趋势。 International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) is the major arbitration institutions of international investment disputes. The arbitration jurisdiction is based on the consent of the parties and the confir- mation of the qualified investment. However, the dispute is the judgment of the qualified investment. In the case of ICSID, the definition of investment in investment treaties includes general and legal meaning, on this basis, quali- fied investment should have certain conditions under the jurisdiction of ICSID. China should accurately grasp the future development trend of qualified investment judgment standard.
作者 柯月婷
机构地区 厦门大学
出处 《河南司法警官职业学院学报》 2017年第4期77-83,共7页 Journal of Henan Judicial Police Vocational College
关键词 适格投资 投资合法性 投资定义 ICSID管辖权 qualified investment legality of investment definition of investment jurisdiction of ICSID
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献22

  • 1See Salini Costruttori S. p. A. and Italstrade S. p. A. v. Kingdom of Morocco, ICSID Case No. ARB/00/4,July 23, 2001.
  • 2季烨:《国际投贤条约中投资定义的扩张及其限度》,载《北大法律评论》编辑委员会编:《北大法律评论》第12卷第1辑,北京大学出版社2011年版,第85108页.
  • 3See UNCTAD, Scope and Definition UNCTAD Series on Issues in International Investment Agreement II, United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2011, p. 5, http://WWW, unctad, ch/en/docs/diaeia20102 en. pdf,2012 02--28.
  • 4See Kenneth J. Vandevelde, Bilateral Investment Treaties History, Policy and Interpretation, Oxford University Press, 2010, p. 130.
  • 5See UNCTAD, Scope and Definition: UNCTAD Series on Issues in International Investment Agreement, United Nations, New York and Geneva, 1999, p. 24, http://WWW, unctad, org/en/docs/psiteiitdllv2, en. pdf,2012--02--28.
  • 6See Kenneth J. Vandevelde, U.S. International Investment Agreements, Oxford University Press, 2009, p. 118.
  • 7See Alasdair Ross Anderson et al v. Republic of Costa Rica,ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/07/3, May 19, 2010.
  • 8See Inceysa Vallisoletana S. L. v Republic of E1 Salvador,ICSID Case No. ARB/03/26, August 2, 2006; Gustav F W Hamester Gm bH Co KG v. Republic of Ghana,ICSID Case No. ARB/07/24, June 18, 2010.
  • 9See Fraport AG Frankfurt Airport Services Worldwide v. Philippines,ICSID Case No. ARB/03/25, August 16, 2007.
  • 10See Bayindir Insaat Turizm Ticaret Ve Sanayi A. . v. Islamic Republic of Pakistan,ICSID Case No. ARB/03/29, August 27, 2009.

共引文献89

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部