期刊文献+

产品类别与消费者异质性对在线评论意愿影响研究——在线评论与消费体验的比较情景 被引量:3

Impact of Product Category and ty on Online Comment Intention --In the Comparative Scene of Online Comment and Consuming Experiences
原文传递
导出
摘要 基于B2C平台搜索品和体验品分类视角,文章引入调节定向理论探究在线评论与消费体验正负面相一致或相矛盾情境下异质性消费者在线评论意愿的差异性。研究表明:(1)在线评论呈正面或负面性时,促进定向消费者在正面消费体验时总是比预防定向调节消费者的在线评论意愿更高,但预防定向消费者在负面消费体验时总是比促进定向消费者的在线评论意愿更高;(2)消费者正面或负面消费体验时,不同调节定向消费者对搜索品与体验品的在线评论意愿存在差异;(3)不同调节定向消费者对体验品的在线评论意愿差异程度都高于搜索品。基于研究发现,为商家有效管理在线评论工作提供理论依据与实践参考。 Based on the category of search goods and experience goods on B2C platform, this research introduced regulatory focus theory to explore the difference in heterogeneous consumers' online comment intention between scenarios in which online comment and consuming experience agree with or contradict to each other. The research has shown: (1) When the consuming experience is positive, online comment intention of consumers with promotion focus is always higher than those with prevention focus, while in negative consuming experience, the online comment intention of consumers with prevention focus is always higher than those with promotion focus. (2) When positive or negative consumer experience, consumers with different regulatory focus have different online comment intention to search goods and experience goods. (3) Consumers with different regulatory focus have a stronger intention to comment on experience goods than search goods online. Finally this research provides theoretical evidence and practical reference for businesses to manage online comment effectively.
出处 《南大商学评论》 CSSCI 2017年第1期168-183,共16页 Nanjing Business Review
基金 国家自然科学基金面上资助项目:“企业社会责任行为对丑闻品牌形象的修复机理及策略体系研究”(编号:71372189)资助
关键词 产品类别 在线评论 调节定向 评论意愿 Product category Online review Regulatoryfocus Comment intention
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献195

  • 1赵玲,张静.基于羊群效应的微博用户从众行为分析[J].大连理工大学学报(社会科学版),2013,34(4):92-97. 被引量:17
  • 2温忠麟,张雷,侯杰泰,刘红云.中介效应检验程序及其应用[J].心理学报,2004,36(5):614-620. 被引量:7630
  • 3Sengupta, J., & Zhou, R. (2007). Understanding impulsive eaters' choice behaviors: the motivational influences of regulatory focus. Journal of Marketing Research,44,297-308.
  • 4Shah, J. Y., Brazy, P. C., & Higgins, E. T. (2004). Promoting us or preventing them: Regulatory focus and manifestations of intergroup bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 433-446.
  • 5Shah, J., & Higgins, E. T. (1997). Expectancy X value effects: Regulatory focus as a determinant of magnitude and direction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 447-458.
  • 6Shah, J., & Higgins, E. T. (2001). Regulatory concerns and appraisal efficiency: The general impact of promotion and prevention. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 693-705.
  • 7Aaker, J. L., & Lee, A., Y. (2001). "I" seek pleasures and "we" avoid pains: the role of self-regulatory goals in information processing and persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research, 28, 33-49.
  • 8Amodio, D. M., Shah, J. Y., Sigelman, J., Brazy, P. C., & Harmon-Jones, E. (2004). Implicit regulatory focus associated with asymmetrical frontal cortical activity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 225-232.
  • 9Ayduk, O., May, D., Downey, G., & Higgins, E. T. (2003). Tactical differences in coping with rejection sensitivity: the role of prevention pride. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 435-448.
  • 10Brockner, J., & Higgins, E. T. (2001). Regulatory focus Theory: implications for the study of emotions at work. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 86, 35-66.

共引文献194

同被引文献37

引证文献3

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部