东盟贸易当事人选择法律适用问题研究

A Study of China-ASEAN Trade Parities' Law Application Selections

东盟贸易合同法律适用具有复杂性,意思自治是东盟贸易法律适用的最重要原则。东盟贸易当事人选择适用国际贸易惯例分三种情况:第一款规定"业已同意";第二款规定"除非另有协议";第二款规定的"应视为已默示同意"应视为当事人已经默示地同意了适用国际惯例,在解决合同争议时也可以适用国际惯例相关规定。东盟贸易当事人选择适用国家法律时不得选择冲突法律和程序法律;可以选择与合同没有客观联系的国家的法律;如果当事人选择适用我国法律,应当明确指出到底选择我国的哪个法域的法律。

Along with the booming trades between China and ASEAN countries,disputes over business contracts tend to e merge more frequently,and law applications is getting increasingly complex.Autonomy of will,a historical concept in contract laws,still applies in modern eras with great importance to contemporary principles.In international trade practice,the autonomy of will can be interpreted as follows： firstly,＂have agreed to＂; secondly,＂unless otherwise agreed＂; thirdly,＂implied consent＂.A mong which,the third one＂implied consent＂refers to that the litigant consents to international practice application in solving c ontract disputes.While choosing applicable laws,ASEAN trade litigants are not allowed to choose conflicting laws and norms,but to choose laws of the countries which have no objective links with the contract.Should the litigants choose to apply China＇s laws,they should state clearly the legal unit where the law is applied to.