期刊文献+

多模型迭代重建算法对腹部体模CT扫描图像质量和辐射剂量的影响 被引量:40

Influence of adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V on image quality and radiation dose of abdominal CT in phantom
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的分析前置全模型迭代重建算法(ASIR-V)在腹部体模CT扫描中图像质量的变化规律及辐射剂量的降低程度,探讨优化图像质量和辐射剂量的最佳前置ASIR-V。方法采用腹部仿真体模和Revolution CT机。根据噪声指数(NI)设置(6、8、10、12、14)分为5组。每组设置0~100%(间隔10%)前置ASIR-V扫描和常规扫描(即不联合迭代),共获得55组图像。分析各NI组图像CT值、噪声、主观评分及辐射剂量随ASIR-V比例的变化规律。各NI组图像的主观评分比较采用秩和检验,CT值、噪声和辐射剂量比较采用单因素方差分析和配对t检验。结果在0~40%前置ASIR-V水平,NI为6、8、10组图像主观评分基本稳定,NI为12、14组图像主观评分呈略升高趋势;50%~100%前置ASIR-V,各组主观评分均呈逐渐降低趋势;NI为6、8、10组,超过70%前置ASIR-V图像主观评分降至3分以下,NI为12、14组,超过60%前置ASIR-V主观评分降至3分以下;NI为6、8、10组,常规扫描图像主观评分与40%前置ASIR-V图像差异无统计学意义(P=0.626、0.915、0.514),NI为12、14组,常规扫描图像主观评分略低于40%前置ASIR-V图像(P=0.041、0.036);各NI组常规扫描图像主观评分均优于60%前置ASIR-V图像((P=0.021、0.012、0.015、0.014、0.007))。各NI组中不同部位CT值、噪声随前置ASIR-V比例的增高呈基本稳定状态(P均>0.05)。各NI组CTDIvol随前置ASIR-V比例的增高,呈逐渐下降趋势。40%、50%和60%前置ASIR-V比例条件下,CTDIvol较常规扫描组下降比率分别为49.82%、62.51%、71.63%。结论前置ASIR-V可在保证图像质量的条件下明显降低辐射剂量;腹部前置ASIR-V比例推荐40%~60%。 Objective To evaluate the influence of preset adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction V (ASIR-V) tech- niques on image quality and radiation dose reduction of abdominal CT in phantom, and to investigate the optimal ASIR-V level. Methods Abdominal anthropomorphic phantom was scanned using Revolution CT, when noise index (NI) were set as 6, 8, 10, 12 and 14, respectively. Then 0-100% ASIR-V and conventional scan was performed and 55 sets of images were obtained. CT value, noise, subjective score and radiation dose were recorded, and the optimal ASIR V was obtained. Subjective scores of images in each group were compared using rank sum test, and CT value, noise and radiation dose were compared with one way ANOVA and paired t test. Results The image subjective score unchanged when NI was 6, 8 or 10, slightly increased when NI was 12 and 14 with 0 40% ASIR-V, and decreased above 50% ASIR-V at all NI. When NI was 6, 8 or 10, more than 70% ASIR-V image subjective score fell below 3 points. When NI was 12 or 14 group, more than 60% ASIR V subjective score fell below 3 points. The image quality score of conventional scan had no difference with 40% ASIR-VwhenNIwas 6, 8 or 10, respectively (P=0.626, 0.915, 0.514), and inferior to 40% ASIR V when NI was 12 or 14 (P=0. 041, 0. 036), while in all NI group, image quality score of conventional scan was superior to 60% ASIR-V (P=0. 021, 0. 012, 0. 015, 0. 014, 0. 007). CT values and image noises had no significant differences in different parts in all NI groups (all P〉0.05). CT dose index volume (CTDIvol) continuing decreased with ASIR-V. Compared with that of conventional scan, at 40%, 50% and 60% ASIR-V, CTDIvol reduced by 49.82%, 62.51% and 71.63%, respectively. Conclusion Preset ASIR V can reduce radiation dose obviously while maintaining the overall image quality, and 40%-60 % ASIRV can be recommended for abdominal CT in clinical application.
出处 《中国医学影像技术》 CSCD 北大核心 2018年第1期118-122,共5页 Chinese Journal of Medical Imaging Technology
基金 国家自然科学基金面上项目(81671682) 郑州大学第一附属医院青年创业基金([2012]233号)
关键词 体层摄影术 X线计算机 迭代重建 辐射剂量 图像质量 体模 Tomography, X-ray computed Iterative reconstruction Radiation dosage Image quality Phantom
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献54

  • 1Andreas Christe,Johannes Heverhagen,Christoph Ozdoba,Christian Weisstanner,Stefan Ulzheimer,Lukas Ebner.CT dose and image quality in the last three scanner generations[J].World Journal of Radiology,2013,5(11):421-429. 被引量:10
  • 2Prakash P, Kalra MK, Diqumarthy SR, et al. Radiation dose re- duction with chest computed tomography using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique: initial experience. J Comput Assist Tomogr, 2010,34(1):40-45.
  • 3Singh S, Kalra MK, Gilman MD, et al. Adaptive statistical itera- tive reconstruction technique for radiation dose reduction in chest CT: a pilot study. Radiology, 2011,259(2):565-573.
  • 4European Study Group of Radiologists and physicists. European guidelines on quality criteria for computed tomography. [2009-09- 12 ] . http://www, drs. dk/guidelines/ct/quality/download/eur16262, w51.
  • 5Sone S, Takashima S, Li F, et al. Mass screening for lung cancer with mobile spiral computed tomography scanner. Lancet, 1998, 351(9111) :1242-1245.
  • 6Diederich S, Lenzen H. Radiation exposure associated with ima- ging of the chest: comparison of different radiographic and com- puted tomography techniques. Cancer, 2000,89(11 Suppl) : 2457- 2460.
  • 7Compagnonel G, Pagan L, Baleni MC, et al. Patient dose in dig- ital projection radiography. Radiat Prot Dosimetry, 2008, 129(1- 3) : 135-137.
  • 8Fujii K, Aoyama T, Koyama S, et al. Comparative evaluation of organ and effective doses for pediatric patients with those for a- dults in chest and abdominal CT examinations. Br J Radiol, 2007, 80(956) :657-667.
  • 9Signal-Cinqualbre AB, Hennequin R, Abada HT, et al. Low-ki- lovohage multi-detector row chest CT in adult: feasibility and effect on image quality and iodine dose. Radiology, 2004, 231 (1) : 169-174.
  • 10Kubo T, Nishino M, Kino A, et al. 3-dimensional adaptive raw- date filter: evaluation in low dose chest multidetector-row com- puted tomography. J Comput Assit Tomogr. 2006,30(6):933- 938.

共引文献194

同被引文献262

引证文献40

二级引证文献162

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部