摘要
在解释过程中,前见有其存在的合法性,并成为解释中无法克服的前提。解释者的处境所决定的视域与流传物本身的视域所实现的视域融合,形成效果历史意识。根据社会存在决定社会意识的原理,这种前见以及效果历史意识,都受到特定社会历史情境及意识形态的制约,因此效果历史意识的合法性需要进一步接受意识形态批评,从而保证解释学的开放性,形成更为合理性的解释。
In the process of interpretation, Vorurteil has its legitimacy of existence, and become an insurmountable precondition in the explanation. The fusion of the field which is determined by the interpreters' circumstances and the relic itself,forming an effective-historical consciousness. According to the principle of social existence which determines social consciousness,both of the Vorurteil and effective-historical consciousness are restricted by the particular socio-historical situation and ideology.Therefore,the legitimacy of the effective-historical consciousness needs further ideological criticism to ensure the openness of hermeneutics,and to form a more reasonable explanation. In this sense,Marx' s inverted reflections of ideology,especially his critique of commodity fetishism,become an important theoretical basis for the reflections of effective-historical consciousness.
出处
《世界哲学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2018年第1期26-34,共9页
World Philosophy
基金
国家社科基金重点项目"国外马克思主义哲学基础理论问题研究"(项目编号:16AZX002)的阶段性成果