期刊文献+

臭氧-生物活性炭工艺间歇性运行时保存方法的优化研究 被引量:2

Optimization Study of Preserve Method of O_3-BAC Filter in Intermittent Operation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对目前生物活性炭炭滤池间歇性运行时在停运期间的保存方法缺乏系统性研究开展了运行研究,并在此基础上提出浸泡和小流量保存方法。依托中试活性炭柱装置,将小流量保存时进水流量依次定为20、40、60、80 L/h,运行8 d;中试共3根活性炭柱,分别采用浸泡保存、小流量保存和正常工况运行,运行30 d,监测浸泡与小流量保存时炭层内微生物变化与正常运行时COD_(Mn)和氨氮的去除效能;30 d后活性炭柱重新运行。结果表明,小流量保存进水流量为60 L/h出水水质不会恶化;保存30 d后,小流量保存的微生物变化较浸泡保存变化缓慢并且重新启动24 h后便可达到正常去除效能。可见小流量保存能够有效减缓停运时微生物的变化,显著缩短重新启动所需时间。 In the view of BAC filters of DWTPs lack systematic research when it stop running in intermittent operation condition, immersion and low flowing preservation method were proposed on this basis. The flow was set at 20, 40, 60, 80 L/h relied on the pilot-scale test activated carbon column device, and operated for 8 d. Three BAC columns were in the condition of immersion, low flowing preservation and normal respectively, microbiological changes of immersion, low flowing preservation, COD~ and NI-L+-N removal efficiency of normal operation were detected during 30 d operation. BAC columns were rernnning after 30 d. The results showed that, the water quality would not deteriorate when the flow rate was 60 L/h, the microbiological change of low flowing preservation was slower than immersion after 30 d preservation, and it could reach normal removal efficiency after 24 h rerunning. It could clearly be seen that low flowing preservation could significantly retard the microbiological changes and be shortened the required time of O3-BAC recovered obviously.
出处 《水处理技术》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2018年第1期110-113,共4页 Technology of Water Treatment
基金 宜兴饮用水安全保障技术研究与示范项目(2014ZX07405-002)
关键词 生物活性炭 间歇性运行 浸泡保存 小流量保存 BAC intermittent operation immersion preservation low flowing preservation
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献23

  • 1张伟,陈海松.翻板型滤池的特点及设计探讨[J].中国给水排水,2005,21(4):68-71. 被引量:13
  • 2周俊杰,江庆立,杨春尧,高云霞,朱熔钢,杨燕萍,李轶昆.翻板滤池在昆明给水处理中的应用[J].给水排水,2006,32(3):37-40. 被引量:6
  • 3李瑞成,戴雄奇,陈鹰.翻板型滤池在实际工程中的设计探讨[J].中国给水排水,2006,22(18):48-51. 被引量:12
  • 4冯霞,鲁彬,黄年龙.深圳笔架山水厂翻板活性炭滤池工艺设计探讨[J].给水排水,2006,32(10):1-4. 被引量:8
  • 5Pace NR.Problems with “Procaryote ”.Journal ofBacteriology,2009,191(7):2008-2010.
  • 6van der Heijden MGA,Bardgett RD,and van StraalenNM.The unseen majority:soil microbes as drivers ofplant diversity and productivity in terrestrial ecosystems.Ecology Letters,2008,11(3):296-310.
  • 7Woese CR, Fox GE.Phylogenetic structure of theprokaryotic domain:the primary kingdoms.Proceedings ofthe National Academy of Sciences of the United States ofAmerica,1977,74(11):5088-5090.
  • 8Pace NR.A molecular view of microbial diversity and thebiosphere.Science,1997,276(5313):734-740.
  • 9Wintzingerode FV, Gbel UB, Stackebrandt E.Determination of microbial diversity in environmentalsamples:pitfalls of PCR-based rRNA analysis.FEMSMicrobiology Reviews,1997,21(3):213-229.
  • 10Stahl DA.Lane DJ,Olsen GJ,Pace NR.Analysis ofhydrothermal vent-associated symbionts by ribosomal RNAsequences.Science,1984,224(4647):409-411.

共引文献340

同被引文献36

引证文献2

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部