期刊文献+

臭氧陶瓷膜工艺处理微污染原水效果与膜污染研究 被引量:12

Study on Micro-polluted Water Treatment by Ozone/Ceramic Membrane and Membrane Fouling
下载PDF
导出
摘要 采用臭氧陶瓷膜组合工艺处理微污染原水,对比3种不同截留分子量陶瓷膜对组合工艺去除污染物的影响。研究结果表明,与单独过滤比较,截留分子量为15 k、50 k、150 k的陶瓷膜经过1~4 mg/L臭氧的预处理后膜通量分别提升1.2%~2.6%、6.0%~10.5%、4.2%~8.4%,臭氧对50 k陶瓷膜影响最大,臭氧最佳投加量为2 mg/L。在2mg/L最优臭氧投加量下,15 k、50 k、150 k的陶瓷膜对COD的最大去除率分别为29.2%、24.7%、19.5%,对UV254的最大去除率分别为40.0%、36.7%、41.3%。经过三维荧光分析,富里酸类物质是膜污染的主要物质,陶瓷膜主要截留亲水性有机物(HPI),不同组分有机物对不可逆膜污染的贡献顺序为亲水性有机物(HPI)>强疏水性有机物(HPO)>弱疏水性有机物(TPI)。 An integrated process ofpre-ozonationand ceramic UF membrane filtration was applied to treat micro-polluted water. The influence of three ceramic membranes with different molecular weight cut-offs (MWCO) on the hybrid process were investigated. Research results showed that, compared with membrane filtration alone, the membrane flux of 15 k, 50 k, 150 k ceramic membrane was improved by 1.2%-2.6%, 6.0%-10.5% and 4.2%- 8.4%, respectively after ozone pretreatment. Ozone had the biggest influence on 50 k aceramic membrane, and the best optimization dosage of ozone was 2 mg/L. When ozone dosage was 2 mg/L, the removal rate of COD^by 15 k, 50 k and 150 k was 29.2%, 24.7% and 19.5% respectively, and removal rate of UV2s4was 40.0%, 36.7% and 41.3%, respectively. Through the analysis of three-dimensional fluorescence, Fulvic acid-like components was the main pollutant of membrane fouling, and thecontribution order of organic matter with different component for irreversible fouling potential was HPI〉HPO〉TPI.
出处 《水处理技术》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2018年第1期114-117,122,共5页 Technology of Water Treatment
基金 国家水体污染控制与治理科技重大专项(2017ZX07501001) 江西省对外科技合作计划项目(20151BDH80063)
关键词 臭氧 陶瓷膜 截留分子量 有机物 膜污染 ozone ceramic membrane molecular weight cut-off organic matter membrane fouling
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献58

  • 1Li L, Gao N Y, Deng Y, et al. Characterization of in-tracellular extracellular algae organic matters (AOM) of Microcystic aeruginosa and formation of AOM-asso- ciated disinfection byproducts and odor - taste com- pounds. [J]. Water Res, 2012, 46 (4): 1233-1240.
  • 2Dixon M B, Richard Y, Ho L, et al A coagulation- powdered activated carbon-ultrafiltration-Multiple barri- er approach for removing toxins from two Australian cy- anobacterial blooms[J]. J Hazard Mater, 2011, 186 (2 -3) : 1553-1559.
  • 3Huang H O, Young T A, Schwab K J,et al. Meeha- aisms of virus removal from secondary wastewater efflu- mt by low pressure membrane filtration[J]. J Membr Sci, 2012, (409-410): 1-8.
  • 4Tian J Y, Ernst M, Cui F Y, et al. Correlations of rele- vant membrane foulants with UF membrane fouling in dif- ferent waters[J]. Water ires, 2013, 47(3):1218-1228.
  • 5Lahoussine Turdaud V. Fouling in tangential-flow ultrafil- tration; the effect of colloid size and coagulation pretreat- ment. [,J]. J Membr Sci, 1990, 52(2): 173-190.
  • 6Fan L H, Nguyen T, Roddick F A, et al. Low-pres- sure membrane filtration of secondary effluent in water reuse: pre-treatment for fouling reduction[J]. J Membr Sei, 2008, 320(1-2): 135-142.
  • 7Jermann D, Pronk W, Kagi R, et al. Influence of inter- actions between NOM and particles on UF fouling mechanisms[J]. Water Res, 2008, 42 (14) : 3870- 3878.
  • 8Kim H C, Dempsey B A. Membrane fouling due to algi nate, SMP, EfOM, humic acid, and NOM[J]. J Mem- br Sci, 2013, 428: 190-197.
  • 9Tian J Y, Ernst M, Cui F Y, et aL. Effect of particle size and concentration on the synergistic UF membrane fouling by particles and NOM fractions[J]. J Membr Sci, 2013, 446: 1-9.
  • 10Yuan W, Zydney A L. Humic acid fouling during ul- trafiltration[J]. Environ Sci Technol, 2000, 34(23).. 5043-5050.

共引文献60

同被引文献143

引证文献12

二级引证文献37

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部