中国古代与近现代体育思想的碰撞——解读《论语》与《体育之研究》

Collision between ancient and modern sports thought in China: interpretation of The Analects and Study of Physical Education

2017年4月1日是《体育之研究》刊发一百周年纪念日,百余年来其体育思想对当下中国体育教育有深远的启迪与影响。而在中国古代体育思想发展史上孔子的《论语》占据了极其重要的历史位置。通过文献资料和对比分析等方法对不同时代两个伟大思想家的体育思想进行解读和比较。孔子及毛泽东的体育思想在体育目的及体育地位层面存在一定程度的差异,孔子的体育思想是服务于封建统治,从属于"礼",毛泽东的体育思想是服务于人民、服务于整个国家,在德智体教育体系中处于统领地位。在理念层面,两人都认同体育的身心全面发展观;在实践层面,都推崇身体力行;在功能上都注重休闲健身,淡化功利。

April 1, 2017 is the 100th anniversary of the publication of Study of Physical Education, and in the past 100 years, its sports thinking has had far-reaching inspiration and influence on the current Chinese physical education. In the history of ancient Chinese sports thought, Confucius＂ The Analects occupies an extremely important historical position. Through literature and comparative analysis and other methods, a comparative interpretation was made on the two great thinkers of different times on the sports thought. Research suggests that there is a certain degree of difference in sports purposes and sport status of Confucius and Mao Zedong. Confucius＇s sport thought was to serve the feudal rule, belonging to ＂ the ritual＂. Mao＇s sport thought was to serve the people, to serve the whole country, having a leading position in the education system of morality,intelligence and physique. However, in the concept level, both identify with the comprehensive development of body and mind; in the practical level, they praise highly personal practice; and both value the leisure fitness function and dilute the utilitarian.