期刊文献+

知识型员工离职意愿消减行为研究——基于多变量视角下的模型构建与实证研究 被引量:5

Analysis on Disaggregation of Turnover Intention in Knowledge Workers--The Model Building and Quantitative Study from the Perspective of Multivariable
下载PDF
导出
摘要 离职意愿是离职行为重要的前因变量,但并非所有程度的离职意愿都导致直接离职,知识型员工会综合考虑环境因素和离职后果而决定采取积极行为、消极行为或对抗行为来消减离职意愿,而组织支持是影响离职意愿消减行为选择的重要因素。研究通过问卷调查收集了720名企业技术人员和管理人员的样本数据,Logistic回归分析结果显示,组织支持对离职意愿消减行为中的积极行为具有正向作用,对消极行为和对抗行为具有负向作用。层级回归分析结果显示,组织认同和职业认同是组织支持影响离职意愿消减行为的中介变量。组织-职业认同促进和冲突在组织支持影响离职意愿消减行为的过程中起调节作用,组织-职业认同低促进或组织-职业认同高冲突条件下,组织支持对离职意愿消减行为的影响更大。 Based on the questionnaire sur^^ey of 720 staff from animation fir^ns, this paper takes an empirical study on the relatinship between organizational support and disaggregation of turnover intention. The results of multiple logistic regression shown that organizational support, including instrumental and emotional supports, had positive effect on positive disaggregating behavior of turnovintention, and negative effect on passive and antagonistic behaviors. The results of hierarchical multiple regressions found that organizational and professional identifications mediated the relationship between organizational support and disaggregation of turnover intentioMoreover, the interaction of organizational and professional identifications moderated the relationship of organizational support and disaggregation of turnover intention. Organizational support made the largest influence on disaggregation of turnover intention when higconfliction between organizational and professional identifications, or low facilitation between them.
出处 《技术经济与管理研究》 北大核心 2018年第1期46-53,共8页 Journal of Technical Economics & Management
基金 国家社会科学基金重点项目(12AGL001)
关键词 知识型员工 组织支持 离职意愿消减 组织认同 职业认同 Knowledge workers Organizational support Disaggregation of turnover intention Organizational identification Professional identification
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献82

  • 1凌文辁,张治灿,方俐洛.影响组织承诺的因素探讨[J].心理学报,2001,33(3):259-263. 被引量:131
  • 2段兴民,王亚洲.知识型员工离职影响因素的实证分析[J].中国人力资源开发,2005,22(5):18-22. 被引量:16
  • 3凌文辁,杨海军,方俐洛.企业员工的组织支持感[J].心理学报,2006,38(2):281-287. 被引量:389
  • 4Fiske S T. Social Beings: A Core Motives Approach to Social Psychology. John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 2004.
  • 5Jonas K, Broemer P, Diehl M. Attitudinal ambivalence. In: Stroebe W, Hewstone M. European Review of Social Psychology.Vol.11. UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 2000.
  • 6Priester J R, Petty R E. The gradual threshold model of ambivalence: Relating the positive and negative bases of attitudes to subjective ambivalence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1996, 71(3): 431-449.
  • 7Tompson M M, Zanna M P, Griffin D W. Let's not be indifferent about (attitudinal) ambivalence. In: Petty R E & Krosnick J A (Eds.). Attitude Strength: Antecedents and Consequences. Mahwah, N J: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1995.
  • 8Conner M, Sparks P. Ambivalence and attitudes. In: Stroebe W, Hewstone Med. European Review of Social Psychology. Vol. 12.UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 2002.
  • 9Maio G R, Esses V M, Bell D W. Examining conflict between components of attitudes: Ambivalence and inconsistency are distinct constructs. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 2000, 32(1): 58-70.
  • 10Kaplan K J.On the ambivalence-indifference problem in attitude theory and measurement: A suggested modification of the semantic differential technique. Psychological Bulletin, 1972, 77: 361-372.

共引文献115

同被引文献66

引证文献5

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部