摘要
目的:旨在对比两种不同药液穴位注射治疗周围性面神经麻痹的疗效。方法:将招募的70例周围性面神经麻痹患者随机纳入试验组(丹参注射液穴位注射组)和对照组(维生素B_(12)注射液穴位注射组)各35例。试验组穴位注射液体选择丹参注射液,对照组选择维生素B_(12)注射液。每周行3次治疗,1周为1个疗程,一共4个疗程。分别在4个不同的观察时点,采用相关评分表评价疗效。结果:两组患者治疗前后面神经功能总评分比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);根据不同观察时点对比,其疗效差异有统计学差异(P<0.05);试验组和对照组组间疗效差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:两组疗法治疗周围性面神经麻痹均有疗效,两组疗效相仿;根据不同观察时点对比,说明随着治疗时间延长,效果更明显,值得临床推广。
Objective:In order to compare the effectiveness of two different acupoint- injection on peripheral facial paralysis. Methods : Subjects were divided randomly into two groups : experimental group ( acupoint - injection with Danshen Injection) and control group ( acupoint - injection with vitamin B12 injection). Each group had 35 cases. The differences between experimental group and control group was acupoint - injection with different injections ,3 times a week, 1 week for a course, a total of 4 course. Use scales to evaluate the effectiveness. Results:There wre significant differences (P 〈 0. 05 ) before and after treatment and differ- ent treatment time points in the same group. The effectiveness of two groups had no significant difference ( P 〉 0. 05 ). Conclusion : The effectiveness of two groups have similar effect in the treatment of peripheral facial paralysis. As the time increasing, the effect would be better.
出处
《辽宁中医杂志》
CAS
北大核心
2017年第12期2584-2587,共4页
Liaoning Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine
基金
国家自然科学基金(81373883)