科研基金资助投入与高水平国际论文产出研究——基于六国SCI论文的实证分析

Scientific Research Funding Input and High Level International Papers Output:The Empirical Analysis Based on the SCI Papers of 6 Countries

为正确认识科研基金资助投入和高水平国际论文产出之间的关系,对Web of Science核心合集引文索引数据库中2012—2016年间发表论文最多的六国(美国、中国、德国、英国、日本和法国)的科研基金资助与论文产出进行整体分析。研究发现,各国基金资助存在三种模式:单一基金主导模式、双基金共导模式、多基金参与模式。各国SCI基金论文的数量是非基金论文的两倍多,被引频次也是非基金论文的两倍多,科研基金资助能够显著提高SCI论文产出的数量和质量,其中单一基金主导模式下的基金论文的最大被引频次最高。

To correctly understand the relationship between scientific research funding input and high level international papers output, the paper makes a whole analysis of scientific research funding and paper output in Web of Science database from 2012 to 2016 of the six countries ： United States, China, Germany, Britain, Japan and France. The study finds that there are three scientific research funding models： single foundation dominating model, double foundations guiding mode, multi-foundation participating model. For all the six countries, the number of SCI funding papers is the double of SCI non-funding papers, as well as the cited frequency. So the scientific research funding can significantly improve the quantity and quality of the output of SCI papers.