期刊文献+

基于BCS的普通口服固体常释制剂生物等效性试验豁免的量化风险评估 被引量:3

Quantitative Risk Assessment of Biowaiver for Immediate-release Solid Oral Dosage Forms Based on BCS Classification
原文传递
导出
摘要 建立了口服固体常释制剂的生物等效性试验豁免的量化风险评估方法。基于生物药剂学分类系统(BCS),利用鱼骨图找到生物豁免风险的影响因素并进行综合分析,利用量化指标的风险评价方法对风险因素进行综合评分,从而为生物豁免的风险和可行性进行分级。此量化风险评估方法基于科学与风险,为制药企业及监管部门的生物豁免决策提供了简单易行的风险分析工具。 A quantitative risk assessment method of biowaiver for immediate-release solid oral dosage forms is established. Based on biopharmaceutics classification system (BCS), fishbone analysis method is used to find the influence factors for biowaiver. Influence factors are analyzed synthetically and given different weight assignments according to their influence degree to biowaiver risk, which are multiplied by the property value to get the biowaiver risk score. Eight points are defined as high risk factors, while 4--6 points are medium risk factors, and 1--3 points are low risk factors. A model of ranking biowaiver risk and feasibility is established according to different risk factors combination. Levofloxacin, nifedipine and other 8 kinds of pharmaceutics in FDA "Bioequivalence Recommendations for Specific Products" are analyzed and ranked using this quantitative risk assessment model, the conclusions are consistent with FDA's recommendations. This quantitative risk assessment is based on science and risk, and provides a simple and easy risk analysis method for the biowaiver decision in pharmaceutical companies and regulators.
出处 《中国医药工业杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2018年第1期29-37,共9页 Chinese Journal of Pharmaceuticals
关键词 口服固体常释制剂 生物药剂学分类系统 生物等效性试验豁免 鱼骨图分析法 量化风险评估 风险管理 immediate-release solid oral dosage form biopharmaceutics classification system biowaiver fishbone analysis method quantitative risk assessment risk management
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献35

  • 1Cogdill RP, Drennen JK. Risk-based Quality by Design (QbD): a Taguchi perspective on the assessment of product quality, and the quantitative linkage of drug product parameters and clinical performance[J]. J Pharm Innov, 2008, 3(1): 23-29.
  • 2Yin Y, Chen C. Optimizing first - time - in - human trial design for studying dose proportionality ~ J J. Drug Informat J, 2001,35 : 1065 - 1078.
  • 3Hummel J, McKendrick S, Brindley C, et al. Exploratory assess- ment of dose proportionality: review of current approaches and proposal for a practical criterion [ J ]. Pharm Stat, 2009,8 : 38 - 49.
  • 4Smith BP, Vandenhende FR, DeSante KA, et aL Confidence inter- val criteria for assessment of dose proportionality [ J ]. Pharrn Res, 2000,17 : 1278 - 1283.
  • 5FDA. BioavailaMlity and bioequivalence requirements: Defini- tions[ EB/OL]. Code of Federal Regulation Title 21 (CFR 21 ) Sec. 320.1,(2014-04-01) [2014 -08-13]. http://www. accessdata, fda. gov/scripts/cdrh/efdocs/cfCFR/CFRSearch, cfm? fr =320.1.
  • 6DICKINSON PA, LEE WW, STOTT PW, et al. Clinical rele- vance of dissolution testing in quality by design [ J]. AAPS J, 2008, 10(2) :3,0 -390.
  • 7AMIDON GE, HAWLEY M. Oral bioperformance and 21st cen- tury dissolution[ J]. Mol Pharm, 2010, 7 (5) : 1388 - 1405.
  • 8US Department ,ff Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration Eenter for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) , Guidance for industry. Waiver of in vivo Bioavailabili- ty and Bioequivalence Studies for Immediate-Release Solid Oral Dosage Forms Bused on a Biopharmaceutics Classification System IS]. August 2000.
  • 9POLLI JE. In viro studies are sometimes better than conventional human pharmacokinetic in vivo studies in assessing bioequiva- lence of immediate-release solid oral dosage forms[ J]. AAPS J, 2008, 10(2) : 289 -299.
  • 10FIP. The biowaier monographs-what have we learned? [ EB/OL ]. Biowaiver monographs 2004 - 2012, [ 2014 - 09 - 04 ]. http :// www. fip. org/publieations.

共引文献45

同被引文献18

引证文献3

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部