司法参与公共治理的方式、风险与规避——以公共政策司法为例

The Ways,Risks and Evasion of Judicial Participation in Public Governance:Take the Judicial Application of Public Policy for An Example

司法参与公共治理的表现形式之一,就是将公共政策纳入裁判活动之中。由于公共政策具有多元化的面相以及内含知识结构的开放性,公共政策司法不仅有助于拓展司法参与公共治理的范围,也有助于提升司法公共治理的能力。但公共政策同时也隐含风险,为此就会削弱甚至干扰司法参与公共治理的效果。因而要确保以公共政策司法的方式参与公共治理目标以及效果的实现,就必须要对公共政策进入司法的方式与类型进行归纳,以此为依据,客观展示公共政策司法的风险,并在此基础上建构公共政策司法风险的评估体系与规避机制,从而在整体上提升司法参与公共治理的能力与效果。

One of the manifestations of judicial participation in public governance is to incorporate public policy into the referee's activities. Because public policy has multiple faces and openness of knowledge structure,public policy judicature not only helps expand the scope of judicial participation in public governance,but also helps to enhance judicial public governance capacity. But public policy also implies risk,which will weaken or even interfere with the effect of judicial participation in public governance.In order to ensure the realization of goals and to participate in the public governance of public policy judicial way,it must be summarized on the public policy in the judicial mode and type; on the basis of the objective of public policy, show the risk of the justice to avoid the judicial mechanism construction of public policy risk assessment system and on this basis,enhance the capability of with the effect of judicial participation in public governance in general.