期刊文献+

教育学科如何适应“双一流”建设——基于中美研究型大学教育学科建设比较研究 被引量:15

How does Education Discipline Adapt to the “Double First-class” Construction? A Comparative Study on Educational Discipline Construction in Research Universities between China and USA
下载PDF
导出
摘要 "双一流"建设背景下,我国研究型大学教育学科的发展面临危机与挑战。从机构载体、培养层次、学科专业设置、师资力量四个部分比较中美研究型大学教育学科的建设情况。基于我国现实情况,借鉴美国研究型大学教育学科发展经验,我国教育学科发展应注重跨学科研究,构建学科生态群;要扎根本土打造特色,发挥服务功能,以适应"双一流"建设。 Under the background of " Double First-class" construction,the development of education disciplines in research universities of China faces risks and challenges.This paper makes a comparative study on the institutional carriers,cultivation levels,discipline course provisions and faculties between the research universities in China and in the United States.Based on the practical conditions in China and by learning the experience of research universities in the United States in developing education discipline,this paper proposes that China should pay more attention to the interdisciplinary studies in education discipline development,facilitate discipline "ecological"clustering,and give full play to local characteristics and service functions,so as to better adapt to the"double first-class"construction.
出处 《研究生教育研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2018年第1期83-90,共8页 Journal of Graduate Education
基金 教育部哲学社会科学研究重大攻关课题"世界一流大学和一流学科建设评价体系与推进战略研究"(16JZD044)
关键词 双一流 教育学科 研究型大学 中美比较 "double first-class" education discipline research university comparison between China and the United States
  • 相关文献

同被引文献199

引证文献15

二级引证文献35

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部