期刊文献+

CIFA国际货代考试英语卷测量等价性检验 被引量:1

Testing Measurement Invariance Cross Gender and Region of CIFA English Test
下载PDF
导出
摘要 使用AMOS多组验证性因子分析模型(multi-group confirmatory factor analysis model,MG-CFA)对中国国际货代协会(China International Forwarding Association,以下简称CIFA)英语卷男、女和不同区域(沿海地区与其它地区)群组考生进行了测量等价性检验,结果表明CIFA英语卷具有跨性别、区域测量严等价性,具有较好的跨组效度。该研究为CIFA国际货代英语考试提供了效度依据,并为同类研究提供了参考。 The Measurement Invariance(MI) of CIFA (China International Forwarding Association) English Test is tested cross gender and regions using multi-group confirmatory factor analysis model(MG-CFA). The results show that CIFA English test has strict MI (i.e., configural invariance, metric invariance, scalar invariance, and error variance invariance) cross gender and regions. The study provides cross-group validity evidence for CIFA English test and a pilot example for the similar studies in English testing.
出处 《青岛远洋船员职业学院学报》 2017年第4期68-71,共4页 Journal of Qingdao Ocean Shipping Mariners College
关键词 多组验证性因子分析 结构方程 测量等价性 货代考试 AMOS MG-CFA SEM measurement invariance(MI) CIFA Test AMOS
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献28

  • 1[1]Drasgow F. Biased test items and differential validity. Psychological Bulletin,1982, 92: 526~531
  • 2[2]Bobko P, Kehoe J F. On the fair use of bias: a comment on Drasgow. Psychology Bulletin, 1983, 93: 604~608
  • 3[3]Drasgow F. Scrutinizing psychological tests: measurement equivalence and equivalent relations with external variables are the central issues. Psychological Bulletin, 1984, 95: 34~135
  • 4[4]Drasgow F. Study of the measurement bias of two standardized psychological tests. Journal of Applied psychology, 1987, 72: 19~29
  • 5[5]Byrne B M, Shavelson R J, Muthen B. Testing for the equivalence of factor covariance and mean structures:the issue of partial measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin, 1989,105: 456~466
  • 6[6]Drasgow F, Kanfer R. Equivalence of psychological measurement in heterogeneous populations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1985, 70: 662~680
  • 7[7]Idaszak J R, Bottom W P, Drasgow F. A test of the measurement equivalence of the revised job diagnostic survey: past problems and current solutions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1988, 73: 647~656
  • 8[8]Facteau J D, Craig S B. Are performance appraisal ratings from different rating sources comparable? Journal of Applied Psychology, 2001, 88: 215~227
  • 9[9]Maurer T J, Raju N S, Collins W C. Peer and subordinate performance appraisal measurement equivalence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1998, 83: 693~702
  • 10[10]Mullen M R. Diagnosing measurement equivalence in cross-national research. Journal of International Business Studies, 1995, 26: 573~596

共引文献24

同被引文献7

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部