中国厦门市与韩国大田市居家老年人的抑郁水平和生活满意度

Depression and life satisfaction among residential elderly in Xiamen city,China and Daejeon city,Korea

目的:了解中韩两国居家老年人抑郁水平和生活满意度的差异性及相关因素。方法:采用自填式问卷,调查中国厦门市201名与韩国大田市206名60岁以上的居家老年人,问卷包括一般人口学资料、抑郁量表(GDS)及生活满意度量表(LSI-A)。应用两个独立样本t检验分析中韩老年人的GDS和LSI-A是否存在差异;采用多元逐步回归分析分别探索影响中韩老年人GDS及LSI-A的相关因素。结果:大田市老年人的LSI-A得分高于厦门市老年人(P=0.008);集体活动(β=0.37)、居住方式(β=-0.30)、受教育程度(β=0.16)与中国老年人GDS相关,集体活动(β=-0.36)、居住方式(β=0.17)与LSI-A相关;健康状态(β=-0.33)、集体活动(β=0.24)、居住方式(β=-0.13)与韩国老年人GDS相关,健康状态(β=0.32)、集体活动(β=-0.15)、居住方式(β=0.16)与LSI-A相关。结论:韩国大田市老年人生活满意度优于中国厦门市老年人。

Objective： To compare the differences between Chinese and Korean residential elderly depression status,life satisfaction and relatedfactors in Xiamen China and Daejeon Korea. Methods： A survey was conducted on 201 elder people（≥60 years old） in Xiamen,China and 206 elder ones in Daejeon,Korea. The Geriatric Depression Scale,Life Satisfaction Index-A Scale and self-designed demographic questions were used. Data were analyzed with t-test and multiple stepwise regression analysis. Results： The LSI-A scores were higher in Korean elderly than in Chinese elderly（ P 0. 05）. In Chinese elderly,social activities（ β = 0. 37）,living status（ β =-0. 30） and education level（ β = 0. 16） were associated with GDS scores,and social activity（ β =-0. 36） and living status（ β= 0. 17） were associated with LSI-A scores. In Korea elderly,health status（ β =-0. 33）,social activity（ β = 0. 24）and living status（ β =-0. 13） were associated with GDS scores,and health status（ β = 0. 32）,social activity（ β =-0. 15） and living status（ β = 0. 16） were associated with LSI-A scores. Conclusion： It indicates that Korea elderly have better life satisfaction than Chinese elderly.