期刊文献+

风扇单音噪声模态识别及其误差传递特性研究 被引量:3

Research of Mode Identification and Error Transfer Property on Fan Tonal Noise
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为了探究不同阵列对风扇单音噪声模态识别的影响,对径向耙和轴向传声器阵列在模态分解中的优缺点和误差传递特性进行了数值和实验研究。数值研究中通过在人造声场中加入随机扰动研究了不同阵列在径向模态分解中的误差传递特性,从而对两种阵列在径向模态分解方面的适用性和局限性进行评估。以此为指导,实验中通过旋转轴向阵列测量了风扇管道内顺流和逆流传播的模态波结构。结果表明中低频时径向耙式阵列误差较大,在模态截通频率处其传递函数的条件数大于100,而轴向阵列的条件数要小于10。轴向阵列在径向模态分解时,其精度强烈依赖于阵列轴向间距。实验结果表明管道内入射声波比反射声波能量高10d B左右。在入射声波中,转静干涉模态是其主导模态,而在反射声波中,模态能量分布规律不明显。 In order to analyze the influence on fan tonal noise mode decomposition with different arrays,the merits and drawbacks in mode decomposition using radial rakes and axial arrays and also the error transfer property were investigated in a numerical and experimental way. In the numerical study,the synthetic sound fields were superimposed by stochastic perturbation mode amplitude to analyze the error transfer characteristics of different arrays,the feasibility and limitation of arrays were evaluated subsequently. With above instruction,modal components propagating downstream and upstream were experimentally investigated using rotating axial arrays.Results show that error of radial rakes is larger in low and medium frequencies,the condition number of transfer function at mode cut-on frequencies is larger than 100,however,it is less than 10 in axial arrays. The precision of axial arrays is strongly dependent on the axial interval of the sensors in radial mode analysis. Experimental results show that the sound power of incident sound wave is 10 d B higher than the reflected waves. Rotor-stator interaction modes dominate the incident mode waves,however,the general trend of the modal energy is inconclusive.
出处 《推进技术》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2018年第1期185-195,共11页 Journal of Propulsion Technology
基金 国家自然科学基金(51476134) 中国-欧盟航空科技国际合作项目(688971)
关键词 单音噪声 模态 阵列 叶轮机械 风扇 Tonal noise Mode Array Turbomachinery Fan
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献38

  • 1汪洋海,李晓东.超声速喷流啸声的控制方法[J].推进技术,2007,28(2):211-215. 被引量:16
  • 2Bradbury L J S, Khadem A H. The Distortion of a Jet by Tabs [J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1975, 70 (4): 801-813.
  • 3Samimy M, Zaman K B M Q, Reeder M F. Effect of Tabs on the Flow and Noise Field of an Axisymmetric Jet [J]. AIAA Journal, 1993, 31(3): 609-619.
  • 4Krothapalli A, King C J. The Role of Streamwise Vorti- ces on Sound Generation of a Supersonic [ R]. A1AA 93- 4320.
  • 5Salikuddin M, Martens S, Janardan B A, et al. Experi- mental Study for Multi-Lobed Mixer High Bypass Ex- haust Systems for Subsonic Jet Noise Reduction-Part 2:Acoustic Results[ R]. AIAA 99-1988.
  • 6Gliebe P R, Brausch J F, Majjigi R K, et al. Jet Noise Suppression [ J ]. Journal of Acoustical Society of Ameri- ca, 1995, 1(2): 207-269.
  • 7Calkins F T, Butler G W. Variable Geometry Chevrons for Jet Noise Reduction[ R]. AIAA 2006-2546.
  • 8Callender B, Gutmark E, Martens S. A PIV Flow Field Investigation of Chevron Nozzles Mechanisms and Trends [J]. AIAA Journal, 2004, 43(1): 87-95.
  • 9Saiyed N, Mikkelsen K, Bridges J. Acoustics and Thrust of Quiet Separate-Flow High-Bypass-Ratio Noz- zles[J]. AIAA Journal, 2003, 41(3): 372-378.
  • 10Nesbitt E, Mengle V, Czech M, et al. Flight Test Re- sults for Uniquely Tailored Propulsion-Airframe Aero- Acoustic Chevrons: Community Noise [R]. AIAA 2006- 2438.

共引文献22

同被引文献9

引证文献3

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部