期刊文献+

国内高校科研效率和生产率研究述评及研究展望 被引量:13

The Review and Prospect of Research Efficiency and Productivity in Chinese Universities or Colleges
下载PDF
导出
摘要 精准评估高校科研效率和生产率,对于正确认识高等教育发展现状具有重要意义。在研究对象上,现有研究评估对象多为特定类型或省区高校,全国范围内的高校科研生产效率的评估研究较少。在指标选取上,当前研究不仅关注投入总量也关注平均水平,且越来越注重产出质量的评价。在研究方法上,DEA方法依然是主流方法,但学者们也在不断进行模型改进的新尝试。后续研究需要注意样本选择中的同质性,也要加强对除江西、浙江、安徽、江苏等省份外其他省份高校科研生产效率的评估。通过设立更合理的评价指标,选择合适的DEA改进模型,得到更准确的实证结果并进行稳健性检验。 Evaluating the research efficiency and productivity in Chinese universities or colleges accurately is of great significance in having a good command or understanding of the development of higher education. In samples, the existing studies attach more to the speeific types or province colleges and universities. There is little research about research efficiency and productivity in universities around China. In evaluation index, now, scholars are not only concerned about the total amount but also the average level and they attach more to the quality of output. As for the method, DEA method is the mainstream method, but scholars try to improve the traditional DEA model. On this basis, in the future research, you need to pay attention to the homogeneity of samples and try to evaluate the university research efficiency and productivity in other provinces except Jiangxi, Zhejiang, Anhui and Jiangsu. To get more precise results, you need to select a more reasonable evaluation index system and improved DEA model, in the meanwhile, remember to test the robustness of the empirical results.
机构地区 北京师范大学
出处 《现代教育管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2018年第1期54-61,共8页 Modern Education Management
基金 国家自然科学基金面上项目"‘后4%时代’中国高等教育财政投资规模与配置结构研究"(71573020)
关键词 高校 科研效率 科研生产率 评价指标 DEA方法改进 colleges or universities research efficiency research productivity evaluation index improvement of DEA method
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

二级参考文献221

共引文献436

同被引文献137

引证文献13

二级引证文献63

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部