期刊文献+

右美托咪定联合舒芬太尼镇静对急性颅脑损伤开颅手术患者预后的影响 被引量:2

Effect of dexmedetomidine combined with sufentanil on the prognosis of craniotomy patients with acute craniocerebral injury
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨右美托咪定联合舒芬太尼镇静对急性颅脑损伤开颅手术患者预后的影响。方法 80例急性颅脑损伤行开颅手术的患者作为本次研究对象,按照随机抽号的方法分为A组和B组,每组40例。A组患者静脉注入舒芬太尼药物,B组患者在A组基础上静脉注入右美托咪定药物。对比两组患者的术后镇痛效果以及预后不良反应。结果 B组患者术后6、12、24 h的活动状态痛感评分、安静状态痛感评分均低于A组,差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。B组患者不良反应总发生率15.00%低于A组42.50%,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论通过对急性颅脑损伤行开颅手术的患者静脉注入右美托咪定联合舒芬太尼药物,具有显著的镇痛效果,且能够很大程度的降低患者的不良应激反应发生率,在一定程度上保证患者的血流动力学,具有临床推广意义。 Objective To discuss the effect of dexmedetomidine combined with sufentanil on the prognosis of craniotomy patients with acute craniocerebral injury. Methods A total of 80 craniotomy patients with acute craniocerebral injury as study subjects were randomly divided into group A and group B, with 40 cases in each group. Group A received intravenous injection of sufentanil, and group B received intravenous injection of dexmedetomidine on the basis of group A. Comparison were made on postoperative analgesic effect and adverse prognosis between two groups. Results Group B had lower activity state pain score, quiet state pain score in postoperative 6, 12 and 24 h than group A, and the difference was statistically significant(P〈0.05). Group B had lower incidence of total adverse reaction as 15.00% than 42.50% in group A, and the difference was statistically significant(P〈0.05). Conclusion Intravenous injection of dexmedetomidine and sufentanil for craniotomy patients with acute craniocerebral injury provides remarkable analgesic effect, and can greatly reduce the incidence of patient's adverse stress response and ensure their hemodynamics to a certain extent. It contains clinical promotion significance.
作者 肖卓辉
出处 《中国实用医药》 2018年第1期76-77,共2页 China Practical Medicine
关键词 右美托咪定 舒芬太尼 急性颅脑损伤 开颅手术 Dexmedetomidine Sufentanil, Acute craniocerebral injury Craniotomy
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献99

  • 1徐辉,史潇,李梅娜,孙来保,曹铭辉.术中静脉应用不同剂量右美托咪定对老年患者术后硬膜外吗啡镇痛的影响[J].中国老年学杂志,2014,34(3):678-680. 被引量:19
  • 2安友仲,邱海波,黄青青,康焰,管向东.中国重症加强治疗病房患者镇痛和镇静治疗指导意见(2006)[J].中华外科杂志,2006,44(17):1158-1166. 被引量:243
  • 3Riker RR, Shehabi Y, Bokesch PM, et al. Dexmedetomidine vs midazolam for sedation of critically ill patients : a randomized trial. JAMA,2009,301 (5) : 489-499.
  • 4Patel SB, Kress JP. Sedation and analgesia in the mechanically ventilated patient. Am J Respir Crit Care Med,2012,185 (5): 486-497.
  • 5Diedrich DA, Brown DR. Analytic reviews : propofol infusion syndrome in the ICU. J Intensive Care Med,2011,26 (2) : 59-72.
  • 6Riker RR, Fraser GL. Altering intensive care sedation paradigms to improve patient outcomes. A nesthesiol Clin, 2011,29 (4) : 663- 674.
  • 7Hozo SP, Djulbegovic B, Hozo I. Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample. BMC Med Res Methodol, 2005,5 : 13.
  • 8Venn RM, Grounds RM. Comparison between dexmedetomidine and propofol for sedation in the intensive care unit : patient and clinician perceptions. Br J Anaesth, 2001,87 (5) : 684-690.
  • 9Herr DL, Sum-Ping ST, England M. ICU sedation after coronary artery bypass graft surgery:dexmedetomidine-based versus propofol-based sedation regimens. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth, 2003,17 (5) : 576-584.
  • 10Tobias JD, Berkenbosch JW. Sedation during mechanical ventilation in infants and children :dexmedetomidine versus midazolam. South Med J,2004,97 (5) : 451-455.

共引文献143

同被引文献18

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部