期刊文献+

腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术手术室护理配合及效果观察 被引量:7

Nursing cooperation and effect observation in the operation room for laparoscopic radical resection of colorectal cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨在临床应用腹腔镜治疗结直肠癌患者的过程中,应用手术室护理配合措施的护理效果,为临床肿瘤手术治疗奠定基础。方法 76例结直肠癌患者,根据护理方式的不同分为对照组及试验组,各38例。对照组采用常规手术室及术后护理措施,试验组采用手术室护理配合措施。观察比较两组患者术中(出血情况、手术时间)及术后(排气时间、导管留置时间及院内治疗时间)指标和并发症发生情况。结果试验组患者的术中(出血情况、手术时间)及术后(排气时间、导管留置时间及院内治疗时间)指标均显著优于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(t=12.202、10.151、6.146、19.060、6.615,P<0.05)。试验组患者的并发症发生率为5.3%(2/38),显著低于对照组的21.1%(8/38),差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论临床应用腹腔镜治疗结直肠癌患者的过程中,应用手术室护理配合措施可显著改善术中、术后指标,并显著降低了并发症的发生几率,应广泛推广。 Objective To discuss the nursing effect of nursing cooperation in the operation room for laparoscopic radical resection of colorectal cancer, and lay foundation for the surgical treatment of clinical tumors. Methods A total of 76 colorectal cancer patients were divided by different nursing methods into control group and experimental group, with 38 cases in each group. The control group received conventional operation room and postoperative nursing measures, and the experimental group received nursing coordination measures in operation room. Observation and comparison were made on intraopetative (bleeding, operation time) and postoperative (exhaust time, catheter retention time, and hospital treatment time) indicators and occurrence of complications between two groups. Results The experimental group had obviously better intraoperative (bleeding, operation time) and postoperative (exhaust time, catheter retention time, and hospital treatment time) indicators than the control group, and their difference was statistically significant (t=12.202, 10.151, 6.146, 19.060, 6.615, P〈0.05). The experimental group had obviously lower incidence of complications as 5.3% (2/38) than 21.1% (8/38) in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P〈0.05). Conclusion Clinical application of laparoscopic treatment of colorectal cancer patients, operation room nursing cooperation measures can significantly improve intraoperative and postoperative indicators, and significantly reduce the incidence of complications. This method should be widely promoted.
作者 郑国新
出处 《中国实用医药》 2018年第2期119-121,共3页 China Practical Medicine
关键词 结直肠癌 腹腔镜 手术室护理配合 效果 Colorectal cancer Laparoscope Nursing cooperation in the operation room Effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献36

  • 1魏淑静,于凤侠,王艳华.护理干预对手术患者术前应激反应的影响[J].中华现代护理杂志,2007,13(35):3480-3481. 被引量:27
  • 2郭金环.腹腔镜下大肠肿瘤切除术围手术期护理[J].中国肛肠病杂志,2005,25(2):54-54. 被引量:13
  • 3Mirza MS, Longman R J, Farrokhyar F, et al. Long- term outcomes for laparoscopic versus open resection of nonmetastatic colorectal cancer [ J ]. J Laparoendcsc Adv Surg Tech A, 2008,18 (5) : 679 - 685.
  • 4Ng SS, Leung KL, Lee JF,et al. Laparoscopic-assisted versus open abdominoperineal resection for low rectal cancer:a prospective randomized trial[ J]. Ann Surg 0ncol,2008,15 (9) :2418-2425.
  • 5Morino M, Allaix ME, Giraudo G, et al. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for extraperitoneal rectal cancer:a prospective compara- tive study [ J ]. Surg Endosc, 2005,19 ( 11 ) : 1460-1467.
  • 6Zhou ZG, Hu M, Li Y, et al. Laparoscopie vs open total mesorectal excision with anal sphincter preservation for low rectal cancer [ J ]. Surg Endosc, 2004,18 ( 8 ) : 1211-1215.
  • 7Heald RJ. Total mesorectal excision is optimal surgery for rectal cancer:a Scandinavian consensus [ J ]. Br J Surg, 1995,82 ( 10 ) : 1297-1299.
  • 8Spiliotis J, Zoras O. Extraperitoneal rectal cancer : why laparoscopie may be more ettective than open surgery[J]. 5urg Endosc, 2011,25 (2) :658-660.
  • 9Asoglu O, Matlim T, Karanlik H, et al. Impact of laparoscopic surgery on bladder and sexual function after total mesoreetal exci- sion for rectal cancer [ J ]. Surg Endosc, 2009,23 ( 2 ) : 296-303.
  • 10吴在德 吴肇汉.外科学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2003,8.900.

共引文献161

同被引文献26

引证文献7

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部