期刊文献+

促进科学家参与科学传播需政策与机制并重 被引量:14

Promoting scientists' engagement in science communication: policies and mechanisms are equally important
原文传递
导出
摘要 科学传播需要科学家的参与.但是总体上来说,我国目前缺乏对科学家参与科学传播的强制性或鼓励性的政策,这在一定程度上抑制了科学家参与科普的激情.本文对2016年开展的科学家群体问卷调查进行了分析和梳理,提出促进科学家参与科学传播应该多管齐下. Authentic science information comes from scientists, who play an important role in science communication. However, currently there are inadequate policies encouraging scientists to be engaged in science communication, which poses a barrier for them. This paper argues that policy incentives are not enough to mobilize scientists for science communication, using data from a survey covering 700 Chinese scientists and from a separate qualitative interview study among more than 30 communication-savvy scientists. Our study examined real engagement of scientists' in science communication, their impression on the role of science communication in building their academic prestige, and the perceived factors pro- hibiting their engagement in the new media context. We concluded that to promote scientists' engagement in science communication, we should not only pay attention to policies and regulations, but also design various schemes to train scientists with communication skills, facilitate their interaction with the media and other science communicators, and encourage the evolution of a scientific culture that appreciates a closer tie between scientists and the public.
出处 《科学通报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2017年第35期4083-4088,共6页 Chinese Science Bulletin
关键词 科学传播 科学家 科技创新 中国工程院 机制 科学技术协会 科学普及 中国科学院 science communication, relationship, survey, policy, mechanism
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献36

  • 1彭泗清.信任的建立机制:关系运作与法制手段[J].社会学研究,1999(2):55-68. 被引量:381
  • 2曹红艳.媒体力量改变着科学传播的进程[J].中国青年科技,2004(11):53-54. 被引量:7
  • 3翟杰全.科技公共传播的传播主体及其参与动机[J].北京理工大学学报(社会科学版),2005,7(5):13-16. 被引量:6
  • 4世界科学大会(布达佩斯,1999).对《科学议程--行动框架》的解释性说明(Introductory Note to the Science Agenda-Frame-work for Action)[EB/OL].http://www.unesco.org/science/wcs/eng/intro_framework.htm:第33条.
  • 5埃德纳·F·艾因西德尔.《理解公众理解科学与技术中的“公众”》,载[德]德尔克斯,冯·格罗特编.《在理解与信赖之间.公众,科学与技术》,田松等译,北京理工大学出版社2006年版,第143-149页.
  • 6Hardin, R. Conceptions and Explanations of Ttrust. In Cook, K. (ed.) Trust in Society, New York. Russell Sage Foundation, 2001, pp. 3 -40.
  • 7Deutsch, M. Trust and Suspicion. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 1958, (2) . 265 -279.
  • 8Hovland, C. , Janis, I. & Kelley, H. Communication and Persuasion . Psychological Studies of Opinion Change. New Haven . Yale University Press, 1953.
  • 9Fukuyama, F. Trust. The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity. New York. The Free Press, 1995.
  • 10[英]史蒂文·耶利.《“公众理解科学”中的科学是什么意思?》,载[德]德尔克斯,冯·格罗特编,《在理解与信赖之间.公众,科学与技术》,田松等译,北京理工大学出版社2006年版,第150-164页.

共引文献30

同被引文献91

引证文献14

二级引证文献75

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部