期刊文献+

追踪护理模式对异基因造血干细胞移植患者营养状况的影响 被引量:8

The effect of follow-nursing model in the nutritional conditions of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation patients
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 探讨追踪护理模式对异基因造血干细胞移植(allo-HSCT)患者营养状况的影响.方法 选取2015年1月至2016年12月接受allo-HSCT的80例患者为研究对象.将80例患者按随机数字表法分为观察组和对照组各40例.给予对照组患者常规护理,给予观察组患者追踪护理.护理3个月后对比2组患者的主观综合性营养评价量表(SGA)分级评定、各项血液指标和各项人体测量学指标.结果 追踪护理后观察组患者营养不良发生率为52.5%(21/40),而对照组患者营养不良发生率为77.5%(31/40),2组比较差异有统计学意义(χ2=4.451,P〈0.05).护理后观察组患者的体质量指数、肱三头肌皮褶厚度、上臂肌围、白蛋白、前白蛋白、血红蛋白显著高于对照组,2组比较差异有统计学意义(t=2.599~36.481,P〈0.05或0.01).结论 给予allo-HSCT患者追踪护理模式较常规护理模式能够提高患者的营养状况,改善患者各项身体指标. Objective To explore the effect of follow-nursing model in the nutritional conditions of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation(allo-HSCT)patients. Methods Eighty patients who underwent allo- HSCT from January 2015 to December 2016 were enrolled and divided into the observation group(40 cases)and the control group(40 cases)by random digit table.The observation group was treated with follow-nursing model, while the control group was treated with regular nursing. The Subjective Global Assessment (SGA), hematologic indexes and other body measurement indexes of the two cohorts were assessed three months later. Results The incidence of malnutrition in the observation group was 52.5%(21/40),compared to the control group with 77.5%(31/40)(χ2=4.451,P〈0.05).The indexes including body mass index, triceps skin fold, arm muscle circumference, albumin, prealbumin and hemoglobin in the observation group were obviously higher than the control group with statistical significance (t=2.599-36.481, P〈0.05 or 0.01). Conclusions The follow-nursing model may improve the nutritional conditions and some other body indexes of allo-HSCT patient compared to regular nursing model.
出处 《中国实用护理杂志》 2017年第31期2444-2447,共4页 Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing
关键词 异基因造血干细胞移植 追踪护理模式 营养状况 Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation Follow- nursing model Nutrition conditions
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献61

  • 1马祖等,郑智华,叶任高,张涤华,吴培根,沈清瑞,余学清.血液透析患者营养状况的评估方法研究[J].新医学,2004,35(10):600-601. 被引量:27
  • 2陈磊,郭万越.食管癌、贲门癌术后早期肠内营养的临床评价[J].苏州大学学报(医学版),2005,25(4):687-688. 被引量:3
  • 3Tracer methodology: how it can help you improve quality[J]. Healthcare Benchmarks Qual Improv, 2004,11(6): 61-63.
  • 4North F, Hunt VL, Chaudhry R, et al. E-surveys as a practical enhancement to tracer methodology for continuous joint commission accreditation readiness[J]. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf, 2009, 35(8): 430-434.
  • 5Joint Commission on Accreditation of Heahhcare Organizations. Tracer methodology, tips and strategies for continuous systems improvement[M]. Department oI Publications, Joint Commission Resource, 2004.
  • 6Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. Joint commission international accreditation standards for hospital[M]. 4th Edition, 2010.
  • 7洪传岳 邱文达.JCI认证及再认证∶国际医院评鉴的经验.台湾医界,2010,.
  • 8Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. Accreditation standards for hospitals[M]. 3rd Edition, Oakbrook Terrace, Illinois, Joint Commission International, 2007.
  • 9美国医疗机构评审国际联合委员会.医院评审标准[M].3版.北京:中国协和医科大学出版社,2008.
  • 10王晓航,丁小萍.造血干细胞移植患者的营养支持及护理[J].解放军护理杂志,2007,24(09A):24-25. 被引量:9

共引文献185

同被引文献105

引证文献8

二级引证文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部