期刊文献+

Impacts of solar multiple on the performance of direct steam generation solar power tower plant with integrated thermal storage 被引量:2

Impacts of solar multiple on the performance of direct steam generation solar power tower plant with integrated thermal storage
原文传递
导出
摘要 Solar multiple (SM) and thermal storage capacity are two key design parameters for revealing the performance of direct steam generation (DSG) solar power tower plant. In the case of settled land area, SM and thermal storage capacity can be optimized to obtain the minimum levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) by adjusting the power generation output. Taking the dual-receiver DSG solar power tower plant with a given size of solar field equivalent electricity of 100 MWe in Sevilla as a reference case, the minimum LCOE is 21.77 /kWhe with an SM of 1.7 and a thermal storage capacity of 3 h. Besides Sevilla, two other sites are also introduced to discuss the influence of annual DNI. When compared with the case of Sevilla, the minimum LCOE and optimal SM of the San Jose site change just slightly, while the minimum LCOE of the Bishop site decreases by 32.8% and the optimal SM is reduced to 1.3. The influence of the size of solar field equivalent electricity is studied as well. The minimum LCOE decreases with the size of solar field, while the optimal SM and thermal storage capacity still remain unchanged. In addition, the sensitivity of different investment in sub-system is investigated. In terms ofoptimal SM and thermal storage capacity, they can decrease with the cost of thermal storage system but increase with the cost of power generation unit. Solar multiple (SM) and thermal storage capacity are two key design parameters for revealing the performance of direct steam generation (DSG) solar power tower plant. In the case of settled land area, SM and thermal storage capacity can be optimized to obtain the minimum levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) by adjusting the power generation output. Taking the dual-receiver DSG solar power tower plant with a given size of solar field equivalent electricity of 100 MWe in Sevilla as a reference case, the minimum LCOE is 21.77 /kWhe with an SM of 1.7 and a thermal storage capacity of 3 h. Besides Sevilla, two other sites are also introduced to discuss the influence of annual DNI. When compared with the case of Sevilla, the minimum LCOE and optimal SM of the San Jose site change just slightly, while the minimum LCOE of the Bishop site decreases by 32.8% and the optimal SM is reduced to 1.3. The influence of the size of solar field equivalent electricity is studied as well. The minimum LCOE decreases with the size of solar field, while the optimal SM and thermal storage capacity still remain unchanged. In addition, the sensitivity of different investment in sub-system is investigated. In terms ofoptimal SM and thermal storage capacity, they can decrease with the cost of thermal storage system but increase with the cost of power generation unit.
出处 《Frontiers in Energy》 SCIE CSCD 2017年第4期461-471,共11页 能源前沿(英文版)
基金 This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51676069), the 111 Project (1312034), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant No. 2016XS30).
关键词 direct steam generation solar power tower solar multiple thermal energy storage capacity levelizedcost of electricity (LCOE) direct steam generation, solar power tower,solar multiple, thermal energy storage capacity, levelizedcost of electricity (LCOE)
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献74

  • 1Xu J, Wang R Z, Li Y. A review of available technologies for seasonal thermal energy storage. Sol Energy, 2014, 103:610-638.
  • 2Yu N, Wang R Z, Wang L W. Sorption thermal storage for solar energy. Prog Energ Combust Sci, 2013, 39:489-514.
  • 3Pinel P, Cruickshank C A, Beausoleil-Morrison I, et al. A review of available methods for seasonal storage of solar thermal energy in residential applications. Renew Sust Energ Rev, 2011, 15:3341-3359.
  • 4N'Tsoukpoe K E, Liu H, Le Pierr6s N, et al. A review on long-term sorption solar energy storage. Renew Sust Energ Rev, 2009, 13: 2385-2396.
  • 5Tatsidjodoung P, Le Pierr6s N, Luo L. A review of potential materials for thermal energy storage in building applications. Renew Sust Energ Rev, 2013, 18:327-349.
  • 6Cot-Gores J, Castell A, Cabeza L F. Thermochemical energy storage and conversion: A-state-of-the-art review of the experimental re- search under practical conditions. Renew Sust Energ Rev, 2012, 16:5207-5224.
  • 7Ding Y, Riffat S B. Thermochemical energy storage technologies for building applications: A state-of-the-art review. Int J Low-Carbon Technol, 2013, 8:106-116.
  • 8Pauken M, Emis N, Watkins B. Thermal energy storage technology developments. In: AIP Conference Proceedings. New Mexico: AIP Publishing, 2007. 412-420.
  • 9Srivastava N C, Eames I W. A review of adsorbents and adsorbates in solid-vapour adsorption heat pump systems. Appl Therm Eng, 1998, 18:707-714.
  • 10Haji Abedin A. Thermochemical energy storage systems: Modelling, analysis and design. Dissertation for Masteral Degree. Oshawa: University of Ontario, 2010.

共引文献8

同被引文献1

引证文献2

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部