摘要
目的了解南通市居民酒后驾驶知识、态度和行为的干预效果评价。方法以南通市社区居民为研究对象,采用问卷调查的方法,调查南通市居民通过开展干预活动后知识、态度和行为的转变。结果干预前后,调查对象的性别、年龄等均无统计学差异。干预后,3项知识("法律规定的‘饮酒驾驶'的最低血液酒精浓度'"、"醉酒驾驶受到的处罚"和"营运车辆因醉驾吊销驾驶证几年")的知晓率分别为57.1%、50.2%和34.8%,较基线调查均有提高(P<0.05)。调查对象的知识总评分从干预前的(2.68±1.74)分提高到干预后的(2.83±1.87)分(P<0.05),行为总评分从干预前的(2.16±0.91)分提高到干预后的(2.25±0.87)分(P<0.05),未见态度总评分有统计学差异。干预后男性行为总评分从(2.02±0.95)分提高到(2.14±0.90)分(P<0.05)。结论本次干预活动取得了较好的效果,但仍需加大酒驾知识的普及,杜绝酒驾行为的发生。
Objective To understand effect of health intervention on knowledge, attitude and behavior related to drink-driving in Nantong. Methods Community residents were the intervention objects, and a questionnaire survey was conducted on the changes of knowledge, attitude and behavior of drink-driving after intervention. Results There were no significant difference in gender and age of subjects before and after intervention. The awareness rates of three knowledge points were 57.1% , 50. 2% and 34. 8%, respectively, and improved compared to baseline survey (P 〈 0. 05) , which were "the minimum blood alcohol concentration of drink-driving on law", "the punishment and the years of operation of the vehicle driving license revoked for drink-driving" . The total score of knowledge on drink-driving was increased from (2. 68±1.74) to (2.83±1.87, P〈0.05), and the score of behavior was increased from (2.16±0.91) to (2.25±0.87, P 〈 0. 05 ). There was no difference found on attitude. The total score of behavior on male was increased from ( 2. 02 ±0. 95 ) to (2. 14± 0. 90, P 〈 0. 05 ). Conclusion Good effect was achieved through the intervention activities. The knowledge was still need to popularize in order to prevent the occurrence of drink-driving.
出处
《中国健康教育》
北大核心
2017年第12期1126-1128,1151,共4页
Chinese Journal of Health Education
基金
南通市市级科技项目(HS149078)
关键词
酒后驾驶
干预
效果评价
Drink-driving
Intervention
Effect evaluation