生物反馈联合电刺激康复治疗对产妇分娩后的影响

Explore the effect of biofeedback combined with electrical stimulation rehabilitation therapy on the delivery of pregnant women

目的探讨对产妇选择生物反馈联合电刺激康复方法加以干预后,观察对分娩后产生的影响。方法选择我院2016年1月~2017年1月收治的100例分娩产妇作为实验对象,按照数字奇偶法分为对照组(50例)和观察组(50例)。对照组给予单纯盆底康复训练,观察给予生物反馈联合电刺激康复训练;比较两组康复治疗效果。结果观察组产妇盆底肌力改善总有效率高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组及对照组产妇治疗后盆底肌肉肌力改善程度高于治疗前,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);组间比较,观察组高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组及对照组产妇治疗后16周阴道肌电压高于治疗后6周,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),组间比较,观察组高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组及对照组产妇夜尿次数少于治疗后6周,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);组间比较,观察组少于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论相比单纯盆底康复训练,生物反馈联合电刺激康复方法可以显著增强产妇的盆底肌肉肌力并且增加其阴道紧缩程度,有效改善分娩后生活质量,值得临床广泛应用。

Objective To investigate the effects of the combined electrostimulation rehabilitation method on maternal selection of biofeedback and the effects of post-delivery.Methods 100 cases of pregnant women who were admitted to our hospital from January 2016 to January 2017 were selected as experimental subjects.According to the number of parity were divided into control group （50 cases） and observation group （50 cases）.The control group was treated with pelvic floor rehabilitation training;Observe biofeedback electric stimulation combined with rehabilitation training;rehabilitation treatment effects were compared between the two groups.Results The total effective rate of pelvic floor muscle improvement in the observation group was higher than that the control group,and the difference was statistically significant （P〈 0.05）.In the observation group and the control group, the improvement of pelvic floor muscle strength was higher than before the treatment,and the difference was statistically significant （P〈0.05）.Compared between groups,the observation group was higher than the control group,and the difference was statistically significant （P〈0.05）.The observation group and control group 16 weeks after treatment maternal vaginal muscles voltage higher than 6 weeks after treatment,the difference was statistically significant （P〈0.05）,the comparison between groups,the observation group was higher than the control group,the difference was statistically significant （P〈0.05）.In the observation group and control group,the number of night urine was less than 6 weeks after treatment,and the difference was statistically significant （P〈0.05）.Compared between groups,the observation group was less than the control group,and the difference was statistically significant （P〈 0.05）.Conclusion Compared with the pure pelvic floor rehabilitation training,biofeedback joint electrical stimulation methods of rehabilitation can significantly enhance maternal pelvic floor muscle strength and increase the degree of vaginal tightening, effectively improve the quality of life,after giving birth to a child is worth wide application in the clinical practice.