期刊文献+

中学生科学理解能力的进阶模型——以能量概念为例 被引量:10

Middle School Students' Progression Model of Scientific Understanding:——Taking Energy Concept as an Example
下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过融合学科能力体系和复杂度等级模型,从理论上建构了刻画中学生科学理解能力进阶发展的层级模型。选取能量概念作为测试任务的内容载体,以1 033名中学生(8-11年级)为被试,通过对Rasch任务难度值的差异检验和回归分析对此模型进行检验。结果显示:(1)三个发展层级的任务难度平均值依次递增,且各层级间的均值差异显著;(2)回归分析表明任务所属的发展层级能够较好地预测任务的难度;(3)被试的学段和能解决任务的发展层级间存在对应关系。上述结果初步检验了所提出的发展层级,并对课程开发、教学设计和后续的其它概念的学习进阶研究有参考价值。 Through fusing the system of subject competence and the Model of Hierarchical Complexity,the progression model of middle school students' scientific understanding was constructed in theory.The model was testified by selecting 1033 students(grade 8-grade 11) as subjects and energy concept as the content,and difference testing and regression analysis on difficulty value of Rasch task.The results show that:(1) the mean of3 development levels' task difficulty increases successively,and there are significant differences between each two levels;(2) the regression analysis can predict the difficulty of tasks.(3) a corresponding relation between students' phase of studying and the progression levels is found.Results above verify the progression levels proposed,and have reference value for curriculum exploitation,teaching design and the subsequent learning progression study of other concepts.
出处 《天津师范大学学报(基础教育版)》 2018年第1期66-72,共7页 Journal of Tianjin Normal University(Elementary Education Edition)
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究规划项目"基于科学概念学习进阶的教学设计模型研究"(13YJA880022) 国家级大学生创新创业训练计划创新训练项目"高中生能量概念学习进阶研究"(201310027032)
关键词 学科能力 科学理解 复杂度等级模型 学习进阶 能量概念 subject competence scientific understanding the Model of Hierarchical Complexity learning progressions energy concept
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献73

  • 1辛自强.问题解决中图式与策略的关系:来自表征复杂性模型的说明[J].心理科学,2004,27(6):1344-1348. 被引量:18
  • 2辛自强,俞国良.学习不良儿童研究的社会认知取向[J].心理科学,2001,24(5):544-548. 被引量:23
  • 3Lewis A, Mayer R E. Students' miscomprehension of relational statements in arithmetic word problem. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1987, 79: 363~371
  • 4Commons M L, Trudeau E J, Stein S A, Richards F A. Hierarchical complexity of tasks shows the existence of developmental stages. Developmental Review, 1998, 18: 237~278
  • 5Halford G S, Wilson W H, Phillips S. Processing capacity defined by relational complexity: Implications for comparative, developmental, and cognitive psychology. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1998, 21(6): 803~831
  • 6Ceci S J. On bio-ecological treatise on intellectual development. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1990. 93~153
  • 7Sternberg R J. Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of human intelligence (in Chinese). Translated by Yu Xiaolin, Wu Guohong. Shanghai: East China Normal University Press , 2000, 15-17(斯腾伯格. 超越IQ: 人类智力的三元理论. 俞晓琳, 吴国宏译. 上海: 华东师范大学出版社, 2000, 15-17 )
  • 8Mayer R E. Frequency norms and structural analysis of algebra story problems into families, categories and templates. Instructional Science, 1981, 10: 135~175
  • 9Mayer R E. Memory for algebra story problems. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1982, 74: 199~216
  • 10Low R, Over R. Hierarchical ordering of schematic knowledge relating to area-of-rectangle problems. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1992, 84(1): 62~69

共引文献202

同被引文献37

引证文献10

二级引证文献32

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部