期刊文献+

复合异丙酚麻醉诱导时舒芬太尼抑制喉罩插管反应的药效学价值

When combined with propofol anesthesia sufentanil inhibition in patients with laryngeal mask intubation pharmacodynamic Value
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨复合异丙酚麻醉诱导时舒芬太尼抑制喉罩插管反应的药效学价值。方法:收集我院2014年1月~2015年12月入院的80例行全麻非腔镜手术患者随机分为两组,A组采取异丙酚诱导+舒芬太尼,B组采取异丙酚诱导+芬太尼,比较两组不同时点麻醉效果、血压与心率、不良反应与诱导时间。结果:两组不同时点麻醉效果、血压与心率均不存在明显差异,不具有统计学意义(P>0.05);A组总体不良反应发生率明显低于B组,存在明显差异,具有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组麻醉诱导时间不存在明显差异,不具有统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:复合异丙酚麻醉诱导时舒芬太尼抑制喉罩插管反应的药效学价值较高,具有借鉴性。 Objective: Discussion propofol during induction of anesthesia Sufentanil pharmaeodynamie inhibition value in patients with laryngeal mask intubation response.Methods: 80 non-collection routine anesthesia laparoseopie patients in our hospital from January 2014 to December 2015 hospitalized surgery were randomly divided into two groups, A group of patients taking propofol + sufentanil, group B patients to take isopropyl phenol induced fentanyl compared two groups of patients at different time points anesthesia, blood pressure and heart rate, adverse reactions and induction time.Results:There was no significant difference between the two groups in the anesthetic effect, blood pressure and heart rate at different time points (P〉0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions in group A was significantly lower than that in group B, with statistically significant differences(P〈0.05 ). There was no significant difference between the two groups in induction time of anesthesia, and there was no statistical significance (P〉0.05).Conclusion: Higher when combined with propofol anesthesia sufentanil inhibition in patients with laryngeal mask intubation pharmacodynamic value, with Reference.
出处 《北方药学》 2018年第2期18-19,共2页 Journal of North Pharmacy
关键词 异丙酚 舒芬太尼 喉罩插管反应 麻醉诱导 Propofol Sufentanil Lal:cngeal mask intubation Induction of anesthesia
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献49

  • 1刘润章,邝建,主编.医学统计学方法与应用.广州:广东人民出版社,2001:307-313.
  • 2O' Meara ME,Jones JG.The laryngeal mask.BMJ,1993,306(6872):224-225.
  • 3Wong CM,Critchley LA,Lee A,et al.Fentanyl dose-response curves when inserting the LMA Classic laryngeal mask airway.Anaesthesia,2007,62(7):654-660.
  • 4Yu AL,Critchley LA,Lee A,et al.Alfentanil dosage when inserting the classic laryngeal mask airway.Anesthesiology,2006,105(4):684-688.
  • 5Kwak HJ,Kim JY,Kim YB,et al.The optimum bolus dese of remifentanil to facilitate laryngeal mask airway insertion with a single standard dose of propofol at induction in children.Anaesthesia,2008,63(9):954-958.
  • 6Scanlon P,Carey M,Power M,et al.Patient response to laryngeal mask insertion after induction of anaesthesia with propofol or thiopentone.Con J Anaesth,1993,40(9):816-818.
  • 7Taha S,Siddik-Sayyid S,Alameddine M,et al.Propofol is superior to thiopental for intubation without muscle relaxants.Can J Anaesth,2005,52(3):249-253.
  • 8sharer SL,Varel JR.Pharmacokinetics,pharmacodynamics and rational opioid selection.Anesthesiology,1991,74(1):53-63.
  • 9Brunner MD,Braithwaite P,Jhaveri R,et al.MAC reduction of isoflurane by sufentanil.Br J Anaesth,1994,72(1):42-46.
  • 10罗瑶,许婷,温开兰.芬太尼联合异丙酚靶控输注麻醉在输尿管镜下气压弹道碎石术的应用[J].中原医刊,2007,34(17):24-24. 被引量:2

共引文献48

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部