期刊文献+

急诊时间对突发急性心肌梗死预后效果的影响

Effect of Emergency Time on Prognosis of Acute Myocardial Infarction
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨急诊时间对突发急诊心肌梗死预后效果的影响。方法选取我院收治的60例突发急性心肌梗死患者分组研究,观察两组患者在不同治疗方式下的心功能指数、治疗效果。结果治疗前两组患者LVEDV、LVESV和LVEF比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),治疗后两组患者上述指标均出现明显改善(P<0.05),观察组患者上述指数改善程度大于参考组(P<0.05);观察组治疗总有效率与参考组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论心肌梗死患者发病12 h内给予早期急诊介入治疗可以有效改善患者心功能,降低复发率。 Objective To investigate the efect of emergency time on the prognosis of sudden onset of emergency myocardial infarction. Methods 60 patients with sudden onset of acute myocardial infarction in our hospital were divided into two groups, the heart function index, efect of treatment with diferent treatments was observed. Results LVEDV, LVESV and LVEF between two groups of patients had no statistically significant difference before treatment (P 〉 0.05), the above indicators were significantly improved after treatment (P 〈 0.05). The improvement of indexs in patients in the observation group was signifcantly larger than that of the reference group (P〈0.05); the total efciency of the observation group and reference group had statistic significant difference (P〈0.05). Conclusion Early emergency interventional therapy in patients with myocardial infarction within 12 h can effectively improve cardiac function, contribute to the improvement of prognosis and reduce recurrence.
作者 都基刚
出处 《中国继续医学教育》 2018年第1期64-65,共2页 China Continuing Medical Education
关键词 急诊时间 介入治疗 急性心肌梗死 emergency time interventional therapy acute myocardial infarction
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献58

  • 1陈燕春,张奇,张瑞岩,沈杰,胡健,杨振坤,张建盛,沈卫峰.急性心肌梗死伴多支病变患者完全血运重建安全性及临床疗效[J].上海医学,2008,31(10):690-693. 被引量:8
  • 2杨伟,陈万春,金惠根,刘宗军,汪蔚青,施佳,王东毅,方平.急性心肌梗死不同时间窗行直接冠状动脉介入治疗的疗效比较[J].上海医学,2005,28(1):49-52. 被引量:16
  • 3中华医学会心血管病分会 中华心血管病杂志编辑委员会.慢性心力衰竭诊断治疗指南.中华心血管病杂志,2007,:1091-1091.
  • 4Fairbanks R J,Shah M N,Lerner E B,et al.Epidemiology and outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in rochester,New York[J].Resuscitation,2007,72(3):415-424.
  • 5Shihara M, Tsutsui H, Tsuchihashi M, et al. In-hospital andone-year outcomes for patients undergoing percutaneous coronaryintervention for acute myocardial infarction [ J ]. Am J Cardiol,2002,90 (9):932-936.
  • 6Widimsky P, Wijns W, Fajadet J, et al. Reperfusion therapy for STelevation acute myocardial infarction in Europe : description of thecurrent situation in 30 countries [ J ]. Eur Heart J,2010,31 (8):943-957.
  • 7Almeda FQ,Snell RJ. Coronary revascularization in multivesseldisease. Which is better, stents or surgery? [ J ]. Postgrad Med,2005,118 ⑷:11-17.
  • 8Hannan EL, Samadashvili Z, Walford G, et al. Culprit vesselpercutaneous coronary intervention versus multivessel and stagedpercutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevationmyocardial infarction patients with multivessel disease [ J ]. JACCCardiovasc Interv,2010,3 (1.) : 22-31.
  • 9Wald DS, Morris JK, Wald NJ, et al. Randomized trial ofpreventive angioplasty in myocardial infarction [ J ]. N Engl JMed,2013,369 (12) : 1115-1123.
  • 10Mohamad T, Bernal JM, Kondur A, et al. Coronaryrevascularization strategy for ST elevation myocardial infarctionwith multivessel disease : experience and results at l~yearfollow-up [ J ]. Am J Ther’2011,18 (2) : 92-100.

共引文献233

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部