腹腔镜术与传统开腹术治疗胆囊结石效果分析

Effect analysis of laparoscopic surgery and traditional laparotomy surgery in the treatment of gallstone

目的分析比较传统开腹术与腹腔镜术治疗胆囊结石的临床效果。方法选取我院2013年3月至2016年3月收治的100例胆囊结石患者为研究对象,根据不同手术方式分为观察组和对照组,各50例。观察组给予腹腔镜手术治疗,对照组给予传统开腹手术治疗。比较两组患者的手术时间、住院时间、术中出血量和护理满意度。结果观察组患者手术时间、住院时间及术中出血量均优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组患者的护理满意度为98.00%,高于对照组的86.00%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论与传统开腹手术相比,腹腔镜术治疗效果更好,缩短了手术时间和住院时间,减少了术中出血量,提高了护理满意度,值得临床推广应用。

Objective To analyze the clinical effects of laparoscopic surgery and traditional laparotomy surgery in the treatment of gallstone. Methods A total of 100 gallstone patients in our hospital from March 2013 to March 2016 were selected as research objects, and divided into control group and observation group according to different surgical methods,with 50 cases in each group. The observation group was given laparoscopic surgery and the control group was given traditional laparotomy surgery. The operation time, hospitalization time, intraoperative blood loss and nursing satisfaction were compared between the two groups. Results The operation time, hospital stay and intraoperative blood loss in the observation group were better than those in the control group, the differences were statistically significant（P〈0.05）. The nursing satisfaction of the observation group was 98.00%, which was higher than 86.00% of the control group, the difference was statistically significant（P〈0.05）. Conclusion The laparoscopic surgery has better curative effect than traditional laparotomy surgery, it can shorten the operation time and hospitalization time, reduce the intraoperative blood loss, improve the satisfaction of nursing, which is worthy of promotion in clinic.