摘要
目的比较两种方法对宫腔镜电切患者宫颈扩张的临床效果。方法抽取80例需行宫腔镜电切术患者随机分为一次性子宫颈扩张器组(实验组),卡孕栓组(对照组)。对两组患者宫颈扩张松弛度,手术视野清晰度,手术时间等,术后体温,手术并发症及不良反应进行比较。结果两组患者手术视野清晰度、手术时间、术后体温情况比较差异均无统计学意义。但实验组患者在宫颈软化程度、手术并发症及不良反应优于对照组,差异均有统计学意义。结论Lamiken-R,KL-30型一次性子宫颈扩张器可以在宫腔镜电切术中推广使用。
AIM To compare the clinical effects of cervical dilatation with two kinds of different methods. Method 80 hysteroscope eleetrotomy cases were randomly divided into two groups, The experimental group used disposable cervical dilatation and the control group used carbopros. Results There is no significant differenee between the two groups in surgical field definition, operation duration and the temperature after operation, the experimental group is better in degree of cervical dilatation and with less complications. Conclusion Disposable cervical dilatations like Lamiken-R can be used in Hysteroscope electrotomy.
出处
《中国医疗设备》
2017年第B12期164-165,共2页
China Medical Devices
关键词
宫腔镜电切术
一次性扩宫棒
卡前列甲酯栓
宫颈扩张
hysteroscope clectrotomy
Disposable cervical dilatationa
carprost methlate soppository
cervical dilatation