期刊文献+

2017版和2009版国家医保药品目录对比研究 被引量:3

Research on the Contrast about National Reimbursement Drug List between 2009 and 2017
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探索《国家基本医疗保险、工伤保险和生育保险药品目录(2017年版)》(以下简称《2017版药品目录》)的调整方向,为指导各省制定省级增补目录提供依据。方法:运用EXCEL和SPSS 18.0对《国家基本医疗保险、工伤保险和生育保险药品目录(2009年版)》和《2017版药品目录》进行对比分析,比较二者差异。结果:《2017版药品目录》中药品种数增加明显,新增了谈判药品目录;《2017版药品目录》西药的分类方式发生改变;目录增补品种多,剔除药品少;医保目录新增剂型多为颗粒剂、口服液体制剂;甲乙类药品增长比例基本一致;国家增强了药品适应症支付限制,减少了对医保门诊的报销限定。结论:本次医保目录调整重点扶持中药和民族药,关注高值药品和儿童药,药品分类更为细化,目录管理日趋严格。 Objective: To explore the adjustment direction of new National Reimbursement Drug List 2017(NDRL) and provide guidance "about supplement of Reimbursement Drug List for each province. Methods: Comparing the differences about NDRL between 2009 and 2017 by EXCEL and SPSS 18.0. Results: More drugs and negotiated drugs were added into the new NDRL. The classifica- tion method of western drugs had been changed. The amount of supplementary drugs was more than eliminated drugs. The main dos- age of supplementary drugs form were granules and oral liquid. The growth proportion of Class-A and Class-B were similar. The gov- ernment had imposed restrictions on drug indication and canceled limit to reimbursement of outpatient service. Conclusion: The new NDRL supported with the hand the traditional Chinese medicine and pays more attention to expensive drugs and pediatric drugs. It al- so subdivided the drug classification and make catalog management more strictly.
出处 《中国卫生经济》 北大核心 2018年第1期44-47,共4页 Chinese Health Economics
关键词 医保药品 药品目录 对比研究 reimbursement drug drug list contrast
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献25

共引文献14

同被引文献38

引证文献3

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部