期刊文献+

制度的本质、变迁与选择——赫维茨制度经济思想诠释及其现实意义 被引量:37

Institution: Nature, Change and Choice——On the Institutional Economic Thought of Hurwicz and Its Practical Significance
原文传递
导出
摘要 制度之于经济发展的基础重要作用,不仅得到新制度经济学派和比较制度分析学派的关注,也得到由赫维茨所开创的机制设计理论的重视,其重要性更是被古今中外的实践所印证。基于对赫维茨制度经济思想的诠释,本文的核心论点有三:(1)制度的本质是具有自我实施性的规则或限制,主要用以稳定个体间的信息交换过程,减少其间所产生的不确定性和激励扭曲,从而达到合意的目标;(2)制度变迁是一个融合了自然演化与人为主动设计元素的叠加过程,制度演化有其客观存在性,但有效的制度设计有利于克服和避免人性弱点带来的负面效应,加速其合理化变迁,达到社会既定目标;(3)不同制度之所以有差异,是因为它们具有不同的制度交易成本(信息效率)、激励相容性,从而具有不同的制度落地能力,导致不同结果,如不同的资源配置效果。对于正处深化改革、制度转型以推进国家治理体系与治理能力现代化进程中的中国而言,了解制度的本质及其变迁具有重要现实意义。 This paper focuses on how to understand the nature of institution and its change and choice. The importance of institution in economic development is valued by both the new institutional economic school and comparative institutional analysis school, and in mechanism design theory initiated by Hurwicz. Moreover, it is verified repeatedly in practice. Based on the interpretation of Hurwicz's institutional economic thought, the paper has three core arguments: First, institution is a self- enforcing rule or restriction that the society naturally evolves or designs according to the exogenous real environment. It is mainly used to stabilize the information exchange process among individuals to reduce the uncertainty and incentive distortions, so as to achieve the desired goal, such as resource allocation efficiency. Second, institutional change is a fusion and superposition process of spontaneous evolution and active design elements. Institutional evolution has its objectivity, but effective institutional design is conducive to avoiding and overcoming the negative effects of human weakness, and accelerating its rationalization changes to achieve the desired social goal. Third, institutions are different because they have different institutional costs (informational efficiency) and incentive compatibility. Different institutional choice will lead to different results, such as varied resource allocation effects. For China that faces the deepening of reform, institutional transformation and modernization of state governance system and capacity, Hurwicz's institutional economic thought has critical practical significance.
出处 《学术月刊》 CSSCI 北大核心 2018年第1期63-77,共15页 Academic Monthly
基金 上海财经大学创新团队支持计划项目“中国经济转型发展的历史与思想研究”(2014110309)的阶段性成果
关键词 制度 制度变迁 制度选择 institution, institutional change, institutional choice
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献76

  • 1田国强.中国下一步的改革与政府职能转变[J].学术前沿,2012(3):34-39. 被引量:11
  • 2王永钦,张晏,章元,陈钊,陆铭.中国的大国发展道路——论分权式改革的得失[J].经济研究,2007,42(1):4-16. 被引量:765
  • 3《致命的自负》,北京:中国社会科学出版社,2000.
  • 4.《中国经济总量已超过英国暂居世界第四》[N].《第一财经日报》,2006年1月26日.
  • 5青木昌彦.《比较制度分析》中译本[M].上海远东出版社,2001..
  • 6周黎安 李宏彬 陈烨.《相对绩效考核:关于中国地方官员晋升的一项经验研究》[J].经济学报,2005,(1).
  • 7Acemnglu, Dawn, and James Robinson, 2004, "Institutions as the Fundamental Cause of Long-Run Growth", NBER Working Paper.
  • 8Allen, Frank, Jun Qian, and Meijun Qian, 2005, "Law, Finance, and Economic Growth in China", Journal of Financial Economics 77: 57-116.
  • 9Aoki, Masahiko, 1988, Information, Incentives and Bargaining in the Japanese Economy, Oxford University Press.
  • 10Besley, Timothy, and Anne Case, 1995, “Incumbent Behavior: Vote Seeking, Tax Setting and Yardstick Competition”, American Economic Review 85, 25-45.

共引文献5789

同被引文献576

引证文献37

二级引证文献302

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部