反思与权衡:转售价格维持的反垄断法分析模式探析

Reflection and Balance:Research on the Analysis Mode of Resale Price Maintenance in China

转售价格维持是具有复杂经济效果的混合体。美国反托拉斯法和欧盟竞争法对转售价格维持采取了不同的分析模式。实践中,我国发改委和法院对转售价格维持的分析模式存在持续性冲突;理论上,我国反垄断法学界对该问题的主张取向不同。确立我国转售价格维持的分析模式须厘清《反垄断法》有关"禁止+豁免"的规范意涵,同时不能脱离对基础事实、管理成本以及分析模式之法律确定性和功能自足的考量,采取可抗辩的违法推定具备适合性,但其依据不是"禁止+豁免"下的逻辑推导。为了避免可抗辩的违法推定落入本身违法的陷阱,应着力构建转售价格维持的抗辩体系和抗辩清单,以此保障抗辩实质化。

The competition effects of RPM are complex. There are differences concerning anti-monopoly analysis mode of RPM between US and EU. In practice, the NDRC and the courts keep persistent conficts concerning the analysis mode of RPM. In theory, China’s anti-monopoly law scholars have different approaches to the subject. The establishment of China’s RPM analysis mode depends on clarifying the normative meaning of “prohibition and exemption”. Besides we must take the foundational facts, the management costs, the legal certainty and the functional autonomy of analysis mode into consideration. The rebuttable illegal presumption of RPM is appropriate for the very circumstances of China.however,it’s basis is not the logic deduction from ＂prohibition and exemption＂. In order to avoid the per se illegal trap and to promote substantial defenses, we should construct the defense system and defense list of RPM.