国内四大核心期刊遴选体系对比分析与研究

Comparative Analysis Research on the Four Evaluation System of Core Journals in China

从基本情况、收录期刊重复率、影响因子等方面,对北大中文核心期刊、中文社会科学引文索引(CSSCI)来源期刊、中国科技核心期刊、中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)来源期刊4种核心期刊遴选体系进行的对比分析发现:在自然科学领域,中文核心期刊与CSCD有70%的来源期刊收录重复,而不重复的期刊中,CSCD来源期刊的平均影响因子高于中文核心期刊;而在社会科学领域,中文核心期刊与CSSCI有近80%的来源期刊收录重复,而不重复的期刊中,CSSCI来源期刊的平均影响因子高于中文核心期刊。通过分析不同核心体系收录期刊质量,以期为相关管理部门进行职称评定、绩效考核、科研项目申报等科研评价时提供参考和借鉴。

The comparative research on four core journal evaluation systems including the Chinese Core Journal developed by Peking University, Chinese Social Science Citation Index （CSSCI）, China Core Journals of Science and Technology and China Science Citation Database （CSCD） from the aspects of the basic situation, the repetition rate of journals, and the impact factor, etc. finds that, in the natural science , Chinese Core Journals and CSCD have 70% of the journals repeated and the average impact factor of CSCD is higher than that of Chinese Core Journals in non repetitive journals. And in the field of social science, Chinese Core Journals and CSSCI have nearly 80% of the journals repeated and the average impact factor of CSSCI is higher than that of Chinese Core Journals in non repetitive journals. The purpose of analyzing the quality of the journals collected by different core journal evaluation systems is to provide reference for related management departments in professional title assessment, performance appraisal, and scientific research project declaration, etc.